Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Nov/Dec;22(6):471-480. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0029. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
There is controversy surrounding the management of orbital roof fractures. Guidelines with regard to when to operate and type of reconstruction are lacking. Categorizing these data will help clinicians make informed decisions about the management of orbital roof fractures and avoid preventable complications. To perform a systematic review evaluating underlying causes, associated complications, and management of orbital roof fractures including reconstructive options in the general population of children and adults. A systematic review using the PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases identified relevant studies for inclusion. Studies were included from 1987 to 2017. Demographics, symptoms, management, reconstruction, and outcomes were reported following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included articles discussing management of traumatic orbital roof fractures across all ages. Included studies were assessed for level of evidence. Forty-seven studies encompassing 526 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 28 case reports, 15 retrospective case series and 4 retrospective cohort studies. The most common etiologies were motor vehicle accidents (39.5%), falls (30.3%), and assault (11.8%). Periorbital ecchymosis, exophthalmos, and dystopia were the most common initial symptoms. In total, 60.0% of patients underwent surgical repair and 40% of patients were managed conservatively. The most common surgical approach was bicoronal (94.8%), followed by a superolateral orbital rim approach and transpalpebral (5.1%). A variety of grafting materials were utilized, including titanium miniplates (46.2%), bone graft (37.7%), porous polyethylene (2.8%), and silastic implants (2.8%). Overall patients undergoing surgery were adults with clinical symptoms including exophthalmos, diplopia, and gaze restriction as well as patients with dura exposure. Most patients undergoing surgery were those with concomitant fractures. The most common fractures among the surgical patients were frontal bone (32.2%), ethmoid (25.2%), and zygomaticomaxillary complex/zygoma (12.2%). Management of orbital roof fractures varies based on individual clinical features including the presence of exophthalmos, gaze restriction, and concomitant injuries such as dural tears. Surgically, bicoronal approaches were performed most commonly along with reconstruction utilizing titanium miniplates. Conservative management was more common among the pediatric population. This systematic review demonstrates both conservative and surgical measures can lead to positive outcomes in appropriately selected patients.
对于眶顶骨折的处理存在争议。目前缺乏关于何时进行手术以及重建类型的指南。对这些数据进行分类有助于临床医生就眶顶骨折的处理做出明智的决策,并避免可预防的并发症。
进行系统评价,评估儿童和成人普通人群中眶顶骨折的潜在原因、相关并发症以及包括重建选择在内的管理。使用 PubMed、EmBase、Cochrane 和 MEDLINE 数据库进行系统评价,确定纳入的相关研究。纳入的研究时间为 1987 年至 2017 年。根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目,报告人口统计学、症状、管理、重建和结果。纳入标准包括讨论所有年龄段创伤性眶顶骨折处理的文章。纳入的研究根据证据水平进行评估。
符合纳入标准的 47 项研究共纳入 526 例患者。其中 28 篇病例报告、15 篇回顾性病例系列研究和 4 篇回顾性队列研究。最常见的病因是机动车事故(39.5%)、跌倒(30.3%)和殴打(11.8%)。眶周瘀斑、眼球突出和眼球运动障碍是最常见的初始症状。共有 60.0%的患者接受了手术修复,40.0%的患者接受了保守治疗。最常见的手术入路是双冠状(94.8%),其次是超外侧眶缘入路和经皮(5.1%)。使用了多种移植物材料,包括钛微型板(46.2%)、骨移植(37.7%)、多孔聚乙烯(2.8%)和硅橡胶植入物(2.8%)。总体而言,接受手术的患者为有临床症状(包括眼球突出、复视和眼球运动受限)和硬脑膜暴露的成年人以及有伴发骨折的患者。大多数接受手术的患者是伴有其他骨折的患者。手术患者中最常见的骨折是额骨(32.2%)、筛骨(25.2%)和颧骨-上颌骨复合体/颧骨(12.2%)。
眶顶骨折的处理因个体临床特征而异,包括眼球突出、眼球运动受限和硬脑膜撕裂等伴发损伤的存在。手术方面,最常采用双冠状入路,同时利用钛微型板进行重建。保守治疗在儿科人群中更为常见。本系统评价表明,在适当选择的患者中,保守和手术治疗都可以取得良好的效果。