Physical Education College, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Provincial Key Lab of Measurement and Evaluation in Human Movement and Bio-information, Shijiazhuang, China.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jan;31(1):30-43. doi: 10.1111/sms.13803. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
Visceral fat loss in response to four-cycle ergometer training regimens with explicit differences in exercise intensity and modality was compared. Fifty-nine obese young women (body fat percentage ≥ 30%) were randomized to a 12-week intervention consisting of either all-out sprint interval training (SIT , n = 11); supramaximal SIT (SIT , 120% O , n = 12); high-intensity interval training (HIIT , 90% O , n = 12), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT, 60% O , n = 11), or no training (CON, n = 13). The total work done per training session in SIT , HIIT , and MICT was confined to 200 kJ, while it was deliberately lower in SIT . The abdominal visceral fat area (AVFA) was measured through computed tomography scans. The whole-body and regional fat mass were assessed through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Pre-, post-, and 3-hour post-exercise serum growth hormone (GH), and epinephrine (EPI) were measured during selected training sessions. Following the intervention, similar reductions in whole-body and regional fat mass were found in all intervention groups, while the reductions in AVFA resulting from SIT , SIT , and HIIT (>15 cm ) were greater in comparison with MICT (<3.5 cm , P < .05). The AVFA reductions among the SITs and HIIT groups were similar, and it was concomitant with the similar exercise-induced releases of serum GH and EPI. CON variables were unchanged. These findings suggest that visceral fat loss induced by interval training at or above 90% O appeared unresponsive to the change in training intensity. Nonetheless, SIT is still the most time-efficient strategy among the four exercise-training regimes for controlling visceral obesity.
比较了四种不同运动强度和方式的四循环测功仪训练方案对内脏脂肪减少的影响。59 名肥胖年轻女性(体脂百分比≥30%)被随机分为 12 周干预组,包括全力冲刺间歇训练(SIT,n=11);超最大 SIT(SIT,120% O,n=12);高强度间歇训练(HIIT,90% O,n=12),中等强度持续训练(MICT,60% O,n=11)或不训练(CON,n=13)。SIT、HIIT 和 MICT 每次训练的总工作量限制在 200kJ,而 SIT 则故意降低。通过计算机断层扫描测量腹部内脏脂肪面积(AVFA)。通过双能 X 射线吸收法评估全身和局部脂肪量。在选定的训练课程中测量运动前后和运动后 3 小时的血清生长激素(GH)和肾上腺素(EPI)。干预后,所有干预组的全身和局部脂肪量均明显减少,而 SIT、SIT 和 HIIT(>15cm)引起的 AVFA 减少与 MICT(<3.5cm,P<.05)相比更大。SIT 和 HIIT 组的 AVFA 减少相似,且与血清 GH 和 EPI 的相似运动诱导释放相关。CON 变量保持不变。这些发现表明,90% O 以上的间歇训练引起的内脏脂肪减少似乎对训练强度的变化没有反应。尽管如此,SIT 仍是四种运动训练方案中控制内脏肥胖最有效的策略。