Centre Hospitalo Universitaire (CHU) Bordeaux, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.
Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Blood Adv. 2020 Aug 25;4(16):3840-3849. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002511.
Postremission treatment is crucial to prevent relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine delivered every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 (HDAC-135) is the standard of care for younger adult patients with AML. Although this standard has been unsuccessfully challenged by other treatment regimens, including multiagent chemotherapy, the timing of HDAC administration has attracted little attention. Here, we retrospectively compared the safety, efficacy, and health care resource consumption associated with HDAC-135 and another standard, condensed HDAC-123 regimen, as consolidation treatment in younger AML patients in first complete response. This study included 221 patients (median age, 46.6 years; range, 18-60 years). HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 were used in 92 and 129 patients, respectively. Both regimens were associated with similar rates of relapse-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival, including in core binding factor AML subgroup in which levels of minimal residual disease reduction were similar in both schedules. Hematological recovery times regarding neutrophils and platelets were significantly shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123, with an average difference of 3 to 4 days for each consolidation cycle. The total duration of hospitalization for the whole postremission program was shorter with HDAC-123 (32 days; interquartile ratio [IQR], 22.0,36.5) compared with HDAC-135 (41 days; IQR, 30.5, 50.0) (P < .0001). In conclusion, the condensed HDAC-123 regimen induced faster hematological recovery and therefore significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without affecting treatment response or outcome in younger AML patients.
缓解后治疗对于预防急性髓系白血病(AML)复发至关重要。对于年轻的 AML 成年患者,每 12 小时给予 1 天、3 天和 5 天的高剂量阿糖胞苷(HDAC-135)是标准治疗方法。尽管这种标准治疗方案尚未被其他治疗方案(包括多药化疗)成功挑战,但 HDAC 给药时间却很少受到关注。在这里,我们回顾性比较了 HDAC-135 和另一种标准治疗方案——浓缩 HDAC-123 方案在年轻 AML 患者首次完全缓解后的巩固治疗中的安全性、疗效和医疗资源消耗。本研究纳入了 221 例患者(中位年龄 46.6 岁;范围 18-60 岁)。分别有 92 例和 129 例患者接受了 HDAC-123 和 HDAC-135 治疗。两种方案的无复发生存率、累积复发率、非复发死亡率和总生存率相似,包括核心结合因子 AML 亚组,两种方案的微小残留疾病减少水平相似。接受 HDAC-123 治疗的患者在中性粒细胞和血小板恢复方面的血液学恢复时间明显缩短,每个巩固周期的平均差异为 3 至 4 天。HDAC-123(32 天;四分位距 [IQR],22.0,36.5)的整个缓解后方案的总住院时间明显短于 HDAC-135(41 天;IQR,30.5,50.0)(P<.0001)。总之,浓缩的 HDAC-123 方案可更快地引起血液学恢复,从而显著缩短住院时间,而不会影响年轻 AML 患者的治疗反应或结局。