Suppr超能文献

奥氮平三联止吐方案在接受中度致吐性化疗且有高化疗致恶心和呕吐风险的胃肠道肿瘤患者中的疗效:一项回顾性研究

Efficacy of Olanzapine-Triple Antiemetic Regimen in Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumor and High Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Wu Xuan, Wu Jingxun, Tong Gangling, Cheng Boran, Chen Minhua, Yu Shaokang, He Lirui, Li Zhu, Wang Shubin

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, People's Republic of China.

Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Shenzhen 518036, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Jul 29;12:6575-6583. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S254398. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dexamethasone combined with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA) dual regimen is the standard prophylaxis regimen for patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). However, it has been found in real-world practice that chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains poorly controlled among patients with gastrointestinal tumor, especially in those with high-risk factors for vomiting, such as female, young, and non-alcoholic individuals. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an olanzapine-containing triple regimen in this clinical setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of gastrointestinal tumor patients who received mFOLFOX6, XELOX, or FOLFIRI chemotherapy at two institutions. All patients included were female and less than 55 years old, with no history of drinking. The patients were divided into two groups for olanzapine-containing triple therapy (olanzapine, tropisetron, and dexamethasone) and non-olanzapine dual therapy (tropisetron and dexamethasone). The study outcomes were complete response (CR), complete control (CC), nausea control, and quality of life (QoL) by the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were included in the study (olanzapine: 40; control: 53). The CR rate in the olanzapine group was significantly higher than that in the control group in delayed and overall phase (75.0% vs 54.7%, p=0.044; 70.0% vs 47.2%; p=0.028). The CC rate in the overall phase was also better in the olanzapine group (62.5% vs 39.6%, p=0.029). The control of nausea in the overall phase showed a superior trend in the olanzapine group (p=0.059). The olanzapine group exhibited higher FLIE scores, which demonstrated better QoL. More patients in the olanzapine group exhibited somnolence and dizziness. Conversely, the incidence of insomnia and anorexia in the olanzapine group was lower.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study indicates that in gastrointestinal tumor patients with high-risk factors for CINV who were receiving MEC, olanzapine-containing triple antiemetic regimen exhibit better efficacy and QoL as compared to non-olanzapine dual regimen. Further randomized studies are required to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

地塞米松联合5-羟色胺3型受体拮抗剂(5-HT3 RA)双重方案是接受中度致吐性化疗(MEC)患者的标准预防方案。然而,在实际临床实践中发现,胃肠道肿瘤患者中化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)仍控制不佳,尤其是在那些有呕吐高危因素的患者中,如女性、年轻人和非饮酒者。因此,我们旨在评估在这种临床情况下含奥氮平的三联方案的疗效。

患者与方法

我们回顾性分析了在两家机构接受mFOLFOX6、XELOX或FOLFIRI化疗的胃肠道肿瘤患者的临床记录。所有纳入患者均为女性,年龄小于55岁,无饮酒史。患者被分为两组,分别接受含奥氮平的三联疗法(奥氮平、托烷司琼和地塞米松)和不含奥氮平的双重疗法(托烷司琼和地塞米松)。研究结局包括完全缓解(CR)、完全控制(CC)、恶心控制情况以及通过功能生活指数-呕吐(FLIE)问卷评估的生活质量(QoL)。

结果

本研究共纳入93例患者(奥氮平组:40例;对照组:53例)。奥氮平组在延迟期和总疗程的CR率显著高于对照组(75.0%对54.7%,p = 0.044;70.0%对47.2%;p = 0.028)。奥氮平组在总疗程的CC率也更高(62.5%对39.6%,p = 0.029)。奥氮平组在总疗程的恶心控制方面显示出更好的趋势(p = 0.059)。奥氮平组的FLIE评分更高,表明生活质量更好。奥氮平组更多患者出现嗜睡和头晕。相反,奥氮平组失眠和厌食的发生率较低。

结论

这项回顾性研究表明,在接受MEC且有CINV高危因素的胃肠道肿瘤患者中,与不含奥氮平的双重方案相比,含奥氮平的三联止吐方案具有更好的疗效和生活质量。需要进一步的随机研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c85/7402666/0f1e0d2853c1/CMAR-12-6575-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验