Numao Hiroshi, Shimaya Koji, Kakuta Akihisa, Shibutani Koichi, Igarashi Syohei, Hasui Keisuke, Hanabata Norihiro, Kanazawa Kosuke, Munakata Masaki
Department of Gastroenterology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology, and Rheumatology, Hirosaki University school of medicine.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov 1;33(11):1400-1407. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001887.
Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a new ultrasound-based elastography method to evaluate liver fibrosis in the daily practice. However, the utility of 2D-SWE among the other liver fibrosis markers is unclear.
We enrolled 141 consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus infection, 66 men and 75 women (median age, 67 years), who underwent liver biopsy and 2D-SWE (LOGIQ E9, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the 2D-SWE with those of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE; MR-Touch, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and platelet counts (PLT), using the histologic METAVIR scoring as the reference standard.
The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) of 2D-SWE, MRE, M2BPGi, FIB-4 and PLT for ≥F2, ≥F3 and F4 were 0.86, 0.88, 0.79, 0.81 and 0.77; 0.92, 0.93, 0.86, 0.87 and 0.83; and 0.91, 0.97, 0.85, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. For diagnosing ≥F2 and ≥F3, the AUROCs of 2D-SWE and those of MRE showed no significant differences, and both 2D-SWE and MRE showed significantly higher AUROCs than the other markers. For diagnosing F4, the AUROC of MRE was significantly higher than those of other fibrosis markers.
2D-SWE has an excellent diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of MRE for assessing significant (≥F2) and severe (≥F3) fibrosis. MRE demonstrated a higher AUROC than 2D-SWE, but this last one has advantages such as lower cost, fewer contraindications and greater ease of performance than MRE.
二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)是日常实践中一种基于超声的新型弹性成像方法,用于评估肝纤维化。然而,2D-SWE在其他肝纤维化标志物中的效用尚不清楚。
我们纳入了141例连续的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者,其中66例男性和75例女性(中位年龄67岁),这些患者接受了肝活检和2D-SWE检查(使用美国威斯康星州沃瓦托萨市通用电气医疗集团的LOGIQ E9)。我们将2D-SWE的诊断准确性与磁共振弹性成像(MRE;使用美国威斯康星州密尔沃基市通用电气医疗集团的MR-Touch)、Mac-2结合蛋白糖基化异构体(M2BPGi)、纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)和血小板计数(PLT)的诊断准确性进行比较,以组织学METAVIR评分作为参考标准。
2D-SWE、MRE、M2BPGi、FIB-4和PLT用于诊断≥F2、≥F3和F4的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为0.86、0.88、0.79、0.81和0.77;0.92、0.93、0.86、0.87和0.83;以及0.91、0.97、0.85、0.85和0.82。对于诊断≥F2和≥F3,2D-SWE的AUROC与MRE的AUROC无显著差异,且2D-SWE和MRE的AUROC均显著高于其他标志物。对于诊断F4,MRE的AUROC显著高于其他纤维化标志物。
2D-SWE在评估显著(≥F2)和严重(≥F3)纤维化方面具有与MRE相当的优异诊断准确性。MRE的AUROC高于2D-SWE,但2D-SWE具有成本更低、禁忌证更少且比MRE操作更简便等优势。