Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激对侧运动皮层治疗亚急性缺血性脑卒中运动功能恢复的随机假刺激对照试验

Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Contralesional Motor Cortex for Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Sep;34(9):856-867. doi: 10.1177/1545968320948610. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the contralesional motor cortex (M1) has demonstrated beneficial effects on motor recovery, but evidence among patients with subacute stroke is lacking. We aimed to investigate whether 1-Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 versus sham rTMS could improve arm function in patients with subacute ischemic stroke when combined with rehabilitative motor training.

METHODS

In total, 77 patients who were within 90 days after their first-ever ischemic stroke were enrolled and randomly allocated to either real (n = 40) or sham rTMS (n = 37). We delivered 1-Hz 30-minute active or sham rTMS before each daily 30-minute occupational therapy sessions over a 2-week period. The primary endpoint was changes in the Box and Block Test (BBT) score immediately after the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary analyses assessed changes in Fugl-Meyer assessment, Finger Tapping Test (FTT), Brunnstrom stage, and grip strength.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinialTrials.gov (NCT02082015).

RESULTS

Changes in BBT immediately after the end of treatment did not differ significantly between the 2 groups ( = .267). Subgroup analysis according to cortical involvement revealed that real rTMS resulted in improvements in BBT at 1 month after EOT (17.4 ± 9.8 real vs 10.9 ± 10.3 sham; = .023) and Brunnstrom stage of the hand immediately after EOT (0.6 ± 0.5 real vs 0.2 ± 0.5 sham; = .023), only in the group without cortical involvement.

CONCLUSION

The effects of real and sham rTMS did not differ significantly among patients within 3 months poststroke. The location of stroke lesions should be considered for future clinical trials.

摘要

背景

低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于对侧运动皮质(M1)已被证实对运动恢复有益,但在亚急性脑卒中患者中缺乏相关证据。本研究旨在探讨 1Hz rTMS 作用于对侧 M1 联合康复运动训练是否能改善亚急性缺血性脑卒中患者的上肢功能。

方法

本研究共纳入了 77 例首次缺血性脑卒中后 90 天内的患者,并随机分为真刺激(n=40)和假刺激(n=37)组。在为期 2 周的治疗中,每天接受 30 分钟作业治疗前,真刺激组和假刺激组分别接受 30 分钟的 1Hz 真刺激或假刺激。主要终点为治疗结束后即刻的箱式测试(BBT)评分变化。次要分析评估了 Fugl-Meyer 评估、指弹测试(FTT)、Brunnstrom 分期和握力的变化。

临床试验注册

ClinialTrials.gov(NCT02082015)。

结果

治疗结束后即刻的 BBT 评分变化在两组间无显著差异( =.267)。根据皮质受累的亚组分析显示,在无皮质受累的患者中,真刺激 rTMS 可改善治疗结束后 1 个月的 BBT(17.4±9.8 真刺激 vs 10.9±10.3 假刺激; =.023)和治疗结束后即刻的手 Brunnstrom 分期(0.6±0.5 真刺激 vs 0.2±0.5 假刺激; =.023)。

结论

在发病后 3 个月内,真刺激 rTMS 和假刺激 rTMS 的效果在患者中无显著差异。未来的临床试验应考虑卒中病灶的位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验