正常肩的三维几何结构:软件分析。
Three-dimensional geometry of the normal shoulder: a software analysis.
机构信息
Institut Universitaire Locomoteur & Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2, UR2CA, Côte d'Azur University, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
SDOD, Saint-Martin d'Uriage, France.
出版信息
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):e468-e477. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.042. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
BACKGROUND
Three-dimensional (3D) geometry of the normal glenohumeral bone anatomy and relations is poorly documented. Our aims were (1) to determine the 3D geometry of the normal glenohumeral joint (GHJ) with reference to the scapular body plane and (2) to identify spatial correlations between the orientation and direction of the humeral head and the glenoid.
METHODS
Computed tomographies (CTs) of the normal, noninjured GHJ were collected from patients who had undergone CTs in the setting of (1) polytrauma, (2) traumatic head injury, (3) chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations, and (4) unilateral trauma with a contralateral normal shoulder. We performed 3D segmentation and measurements with a fully automatic software (Glenosys; Imascap). Measurements were made in reference to the scapular body plane and its transverse axis. Geometric measurements included version, inclination, direction, orientation, best-fit sphere radius (BFSR), humeral subluxation, critical shoulder angle, reverse shoulder angle, glenoid area, and glenohumeral distance. Statistical correlations were sought between glenoid and humeral 3D measurements (Pearson correlation).
RESULTS
A total of 122 normal GHJs (64 men, 58 women, age: 52 ± 17 years) were studied. The glenoid BFSR was always larger than the humerus BFSR (constant factor of 1.5, standard deviation = 0.2). The mean glenoid version and inclination were -6° ± 4° and 7° ± 5°, respectively. Men and women were found to have significantly different values for inclination (6° vs. 9°, P = .02), but not for version. Humeral subluxation was 59% ± 7%, with a linear correlation with glenoid retroversion (r = -0.70, P < .001) regardless of age. There was a significant and linear correlation between glenoid and humeral orientation and direction (r = 0.72 and r = 0.70, P < .001).
CONCLUSION
The 3D geometry of the glenoid and humeral head present distinct limits in normal shoulders that can be set as references in daily practice: version and inclination are -6° and 7°, respectively, and humeral posterior subluxation is 59%; interindividual variations, regardless of the size, are relative to the scapular plane. There exists a strong correlation between the position of the humeral head and the glenoid orientation and direction.
背景
正常肩盂肱骨关节的三维(3D)几何形状和关系的文献记载甚少。我们的目的是:(1)确定参考肩胛体平面的正常肩盂肱关节(GHJ)的 3D 几何形状;(2)确定肱骨头的方向与盂的方向之间的空间相关性。
方法
从因(1)多发伤、(2)创伤性头部损伤、(3)慢性肩锁关节脱位和(4)单侧创伤伴对侧正常肩部而接受 CT 检查的患者中收集正常、未受伤的 GHJ 的 CT。我们使用全自动软件(Glenosys;Imascap)进行 3D 分割和测量。测量值参考肩胛体平面及其横轴。几何测量包括:倾斜度、倾斜角、方向、定位、最佳拟合球半径(BFSR)、肱骨头半脱位、临界肩角、反向肩角、盂面积和盂肱距离。我们寻求盂和肱骨头 3D 测量值之间的统计相关性(Pearson 相关)。
结果
共研究了 122 个正常 GHJ(64 名男性,58 名女性,年龄:52 ± 17 岁)。盂的 BFSR 始终大于肱骨的 BFSR(恒定系数为 1.5,标准差= 0.2)。盂的平均倾斜度和倾斜角分别为-6°±4°和 7°±5°。男性和女性的倾斜角差异有统计学意义(6°比 9°,P =.02),但版本无差异。肱骨头半脱位率为 59%±7%,与盂的后倾(r = -0.70,P <.001)呈线性相关,与年龄无关。盂和肱骨头的定位和方向之间存在显著的线性相关性(r = 0.72 和 r = 0.70,P <.001)。
结论
正常肩部的盂和肱骨头的 3D 几何形状存在明显的限制,可以作为日常实践的参考:倾斜度和倾斜角分别为-6°和 7°,肱骨头后脱位率为 59%;个体间差异无论大小,均与肩胛平面相关。肱骨头的位置与盂的方向和定位之间存在很强的相关性。