From the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jan;48(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001262.
Effectiveness of sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV mobile van outreach programs has been shown to assist in identifying new cases of syphilis and HIV among high-risk populations. However, specific types of mobile outreach testing and their varying abilities to assist in STD/HIV case identification have not been thoroughly explored.
We analyzed data from the Baltimore City Health Department syphilis and HIV testing intake interviews and subsequent laboratory results for clients at any of the 6 different Baltimore City Health Department mobile outreach testing setting types between 2015 and 2018. A total of 8098 syphilis and 7946 HIV testing encounters were included. Cross-tabulation and proportion estimates were used to obtain the volume of new syphilis and HIV diagnoses across the different mobile outreach testing setting types. Multivariable firth logistic regressions for rare events were used to obtain odds ratios for new syphilis diagnoses across the different mobile outreach setting categories.
Testing at street corners yielded the highest proportion of new syphilis cases (0.83%), whereas at community centers, it produced the highest proportion of new HIV cases (0.48%). The adjusted odds for new syphilis were 2.14 among street corners compared with community centers.
The findings indicated that street corners were the most successful at detecting new syphilis cases, whereas community centers were the most successful at detecting new HIV cases. However, because of the small number of new cases detected and low uptake per testing event between 2015 and 2018, STD/HIV mobile testing does not seem to be effective overall.
性传播疾病(STD)/艾滋病毒移动外展计划的有效性已被证明有助于识别高危人群中的梅毒和艾滋病毒新病例。然而,移动外展检测的具体类型及其识别 STD/HIV 病例的不同能力尚未得到彻底探索。
我们分析了 2015 年至 2018 年间巴尔的摩市卫生部门 6 种不同移动外展检测环境类型的梅毒和艾滋病毒检测咨询和后续实验室结果中客户的数据。共包括 8098 例梅毒和 7946 例艾滋病毒检测。交叉表和比例估计用于获得不同移动外展检测环境类型的新梅毒和艾滋病毒诊断量。罕见事件的多变量费尔思逻辑回归用于获得不同移动外展环境类别中新梅毒诊断的优势比。
街角检测产生的新梅毒病例比例最高(0.83%),而社区中心产生的新艾滋病毒病例比例最高(0.48%)。与社区中心相比,街角的新梅毒调整后优势比为 2.14。
这些发现表明,街角在检测新梅毒病例方面最为成功,而社区中心在检测新艾滋病毒病例方面最为成功。然而,由于 2015 年至 2018 年间新病例数量较少,每次检测的参与率较低,因此 STD/HIV 移动检测总体上似乎并不有效。