Suppr超能文献

急诊医生通过e点室间隔分离测量评估的下腔静脉指数和射血分数在急性心力衰竭临床诊断中的作用。

Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure.

作者信息

Duyan Murat, Ünal Aslıhan Yürüktümen, Özturan İbrahim Ulaş, Günsoy Ertuğ

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 18;20(3):105-110. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.290065. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although the reliability of e-point septal separation (EPSS) and caval index (CI) is proven in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), how much they contribute to the initial clinical impression is unclear. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the initial clinical impression of AHF.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study conducted in an academic emergency department (ED). The patients admitted to the ED with acute undifferentiated dyspnea were included. Primary diagnosis was made after an initial clinical evaluation, and a secondary diagnosis was made after EPSS and CI measurements. Independent cardiologists made the final diagnosis. The primary outcome was the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the primary diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were included in the study. The primary diagnosis was found with a sensitivity of 0.55 and specificity of 0.84 and the secondary diagnosis was determined with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.83 in predicting the final diagnosis. The agreement coefficient between the primary and final diagnosis was 0.44 and between the secondary diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 0.61. When the primary diagnosis was coherent with secondary diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.74 and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although a detailed history and physical examination are the essential factors in shaping clinical perception, CI and EPSS combined significantly contribute to the initial clinical impression.

摘要

目的

虽然e点室间隔分离(EPSS)和腔静脉指数(CI)在急性心力衰竭(AHF)诊断中的可靠性已得到证实,但它们对初始临床印象的贡献程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定EPSS和CI对AHF初始临床印象的诊断贡献。

方法

这是一项在学术急诊科(ED)进行的前瞻性观察性研究。纳入因急性未分化呼吸困难入住ED的患者。在初始临床评估后做出初步诊断,在测量EPSS和CI后做出二次诊断。由独立的心脏病专家做出最终诊断。主要结局是EPSS和CI对初步诊断的诊断贡献。

结果

本研究共纳入182例患者。初步诊断预测最终诊断的敏感性为0.55,特异性为0.84;二次诊断预测最终诊断的敏感性为0.78,特异性为0.83。初步诊断与最终诊断之间的一致性系数为0.44,二次诊断与最终诊断之间的一致性系数为0.61。当初步诊断与二次诊断一致时,敏感性和特异性分别为0.74和0.90。

结论

虽然详细的病史和体格检查是形成临床认知的关键因素,但CI和EPSS相结合对初始临床印象有显著贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/388a/7416849/1a14dc36b603/TJEM-20-105-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验