Charlier Jacques, Dobruszkes Frédéric
Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), School of Geography, Place Pasteur 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Faculty of Sciences, DGES-IGEAT, Av. F. D. Roosevelt 50, box 130/03, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
J Transp Geogr. 2020 Jul;87:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102795. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
This paper investigates the changes and current patterns of domestic passenger airline networks in South Africa, considering routes operated and volumes of seats supplied by carriers. This market was liberalised in 1991 and the new market-oriented policy was not challenged by the post-apartheid regime. Flag-carrier South African Airways (SAA) has lost its virtual monopoly, and thus significant volumes and market share, although its decrease is smaller if one considers its regional affiliates and subsidiary. Conversely, low-cost airlines have literally boomed, while British Airways has penetrated the market through a franchise agreement with Comair. Route networks by airline show various patterns. The low-cost carriers tend to concentrate on South Africa's Golden Triangle, while SAA regional affiliates mostly serve thin routes without competitors. Furthermore, the rise of low-cost airlines has led to the utilisation of a secondary airport in Johannesburg, the only African city with a multiple-airport system. Finally, our results are interpreted in light of South Africa's geography, intermodal options and social-political issues.
本文研究了南非国内客运航空公司网络的变化及当前模式,考量了各航空公司运营的航线及提供的座位数量。该市场于1991年实现自由化,后种族隔离政权并未对新的市场导向政策提出挑战。旗舰航空公司南非航空公司(SAA)已失去其实际上的垄断地位,因而失去了大量业务和市场份额,不过,如果将其地区附属公司和子公司考虑在内,其下降幅度会较小。相反,低成本航空公司蓬勃发展,而英国航空公司则通过与康姆航空的特许经营协议打入了该市场。各航空公司的航线网络呈现出不同模式。低成本航空公司往往集中于南非的金三角地区,而南非航空公司的地区附属公司大多运营没有竞争对手的冷门航线。此外,低成本航空公司的兴起导致约翰内斯堡的一个二级机场得到利用,约翰内斯堡是非洲唯一拥有多机场系统的城市。最后,我们根据南非的地理、多式联运选择以及社会政治问题对研究结果进行了解读。