College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, 17 Tsing Hua East Road, Beijing, 100083, China.
Int J Biometeorol. 2020 Dec;64(12):2077-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00484-020-01999-6. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
Thermal indices as environmental risk indicators have been used to assess heat stress of dairy cows. The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the typical cattle-related thermal indices by comparing their prediction to heat stress levels and associations with some physiological responses. The study was conducted from August to September 2019 in a naturally ventilated barn in Jiangsu, China. Nine typical cattle-related thermal indices, i.e., temperature-humidity index (THI), black globe temperature index (BGHI), equivalent temperature index, effective temperature (ET) for dairy cows, respiratory rate predictor (RRP), adjusted temperature-humidity index (THIadj), heat load index (HLI), comprehensive climate index (CCI), and equivalent temperature index for cattle (ETIC), were evaluated. Respiration rate (RR) and body surface temperature (BST) were collected twice per day from a total of 287 lactating cows, 18 of which were continuously measured vaginal temperature (VT). Over the experimental period, the average daily RR, VT, and BST were 55.8 breaths/min, 38.7 °C, and 32.3 to 36.4 °C that depend on body positions, respectively. The study found that the prediction of THI, BGHI, THIadj, and CCI was closer to the actual heat stress conditions which were mild to moderate heat stress. Correlation analyses showed that RR, VT, and BST correlated most closely with effective temperature (r = 0.580; P < 0.05), BGHI (r = 0.642; P < 0.05), and CCI (r = 0.849; P < 0.05). In this evaluation, based on the comprehensive performance of CCI in the relatively accurate prediction to heat stress level and duration, detection on environmental differences between standing and lying zone, and correlations with some physiological responses, CCI is seemingly the promising thermal index to assess heat stress of housed dairy cows.
热指数作为环境风险指标已被用于评估奶牛的热应激。本研究旨在通过比较典型牛相关热指数与热应激水平的相关性及其与某些生理反应的相关性,来评估其预测性能。本研究于 2019 年 8 月至 9 月在中国江苏的一个自然通风牛舍中进行。评估了 9 个典型的牛相关热指数,即温湿度指数(THI)、黑球温度指数(BGHI)、等效温度指数、奶牛有效温度(ET)、呼吸率预测器(RRP)、调整温湿度指数(THIadj)、热负荷指数(HLI)、综合气候指数(CCI)和牛等效温度指数(ETIC)。每天从 287 头泌乳牛中采集两次呼吸率(RR)和体表面温度(BST),其中 18 头连续测量阴道温度(VT)。在实验期间,平均每日 RR、VT 和 BST 分别为 55.8 次/分钟、38.7°C 和 32.3 至 36.4°C,取决于身体位置。研究发现,THI、BGHI、THIadj 和 CCI 的预测与实际热应激条件更为接近,属于轻度至中度热应激。相关分析表明,RR、VT 和 BST 与有效温度(r=0.580;P<0.05)、BGHI(r=0.642;P<0.05)和 CCI(r=0.849;P<0.05)相关性最强。在这项评估中,基于 CCI 在相对准确地预测热应激水平和持续时间方面的综合表现、对站立和躺卧区环境差异的检测能力,以及与某些生理反应的相关性,CCI 似乎是评估圈养奶牛热应激的有前途的热指数。