Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Can J Urol. 2020 Aug;27(4):10285-10293.
Renal mass biopsy (RMB) may not be indicated when the results are unlikely to impact management, such as in young and/or healthy patients and in elderly and/or frail patients. We analyzed the utility of RMB in three patient cohorts stratified by age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (ACCI).
We identified patients with cT1a renal tumors in the National Cancer Database from 2004-2014. We combined age and Charlson-Deyo scores to identify young and/or healthy patients ('healthy-ACCI'), elderly and/or frail patients ('frail-ACCI'), and a reference cohort. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of RMB and treatment. We evaluated the impact of RMB on management by analyzing the proportion of high-grade disease on final pathology as a surrogate for risk stratification.
We identified 36,720 healthy-ACCI, 2,516 frail-ACCI, and 18,989 reference-ACCI patients. Healthy-ACCI patients were less likely to undergo RMB (7.5% versus 10.8%; p < 0.001) while frail-ACCI patients underwent RMB at similar rates (11.8% versus 10.8%; p = 0.14) compared with reference-ACCI patients. On multivariable logistic regression, in both healthy-ACCI and frail-ACCI patients, RMB was associated with decreased odds of surgical treatment, and increased odds of ablation and surveillance (all p < 0.01). In the frail-ACCI patients, higher grade disease at surgery was identified in the RMB cohort (32.9% versus 23.5%, p = 0.05).
RMB is performed less frequently in healthy-ACCI patients compared with the reference cohort. RMB is associated with decreased odds of surgical treatment and increased odds of surveillance and ablation in all cohorts. In frail-ACCI patients who underwent surgery, RMB may provide additional risk stratification as these patients had lower rates of low-grade disease.
当结果不太可能影响治疗时,如在年轻和/或健康患者以及老年和/或体弱患者中,可能不需要进行肾肿瘤活检 (RMB)。我们根据年龄调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数评分 (ACCI) 对三个患者队列进行分析,评估了 RMB 的实用性。
我们从 2004 年至 2014 年的国家癌症数据库中确定了 cT1a 肾肿瘤患者。我们将年龄和 Charlson-Deyo 评分相结合,确定了年轻和/或健康的患者(“健康-ACCI”)、老年和/或体弱的患者(“体弱-ACCI”)和参考队列。我们进行多变量逻辑回归以确定 RMB 和治疗的预测因素。我们通过分析最终病理中的高级别疾病比例作为风险分层的替代指标,评估了 RMB 对治疗的影响。
我们确定了 36720 名健康-ACCI、2516 名体弱-ACCI 和 18989 名参考-ACCI 患者。与参考-ACCI 患者相比,健康-ACCI 患者更不可能接受 RMB(7.5%对 10.8%;p<0.001),而体弱-ACCI 患者接受 RMB 的比例相似(11.8%对 10.8%;p=0.14)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,在健康-ACCI 和体弱-ACCI 患者中,RMB 与手术治疗的可能性降低相关,与消融和监测的可能性增加相关(均 p<0.01)。在体弱-ACCI 患者中,在 RMB 组中发现手术时的高级别疾病更多(32.9%对 23.5%,p=0.05)。
与参考队列相比,健康-ACCI 患者中 RMB 的应用频率较低。在所有队列中,RMB 与手术治疗的可能性降低相关,与监测和消融的可能性增加相关。在接受手术的体弱-ACCI 患者中,RMB 可能提供额外的风险分层,因为这些患者的低级别疾病发生率较低。