Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College.
Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College.
Dent Mater J. 2021 Jan 31;40(1):129-135. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-298. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
In this study, retentive forces were compared between telescopic crowns (TSC) made with poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) using computer-aided design and manufacturing and type 4 gold alloy using the conventional method. The retentive forces of TSCs were evaluated by performing a pull-out test with primary and secondary crowns. Initial retentive force was approximately 12 N for both PEEK and gold alloy TSCs. The retentive force of PEEK TSC was approximately 6.5 N after 10,000 cycles of insertion and removal. The reduction rate in retentive force was smaller for gold alloy TSC. PEEK TSC displayed greater surface roughness on the primary crown compared to the gold alloy TSC. Surface roughness slightly increased at the cervical margin after repetitive insertion and removal. The retentive force of PEEK TSC was smaller than gold alloy TSC, however the retentive force of PEEK TSC was adequate for stabilizing dental prostheses even after 10,000 cycles.
本研究比较了采用计算机辅助设计和制造的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)制作的伸缩式冠(TSC)与传统方法制作的 4 型金合金之间的固位力。通过对初级和次级冠进行拔出试验来评估 TSC 的固位力。PEEK 和金合金 TSC 的初始固位力约为 12 N。经过 10000 次插入和取出循环后,PEEK TSC 的固位力约为 6.5 N。金合金 TSC 的固位力减少率较小。与金合金 TSC 相比,PEEK TSC 的初级冠表面粗糙度更大。经过反复插入和取出后,颈部边缘的表面粗糙度略有增加。PEEK TSC 的固位力小于金合金 TSC,但即使经过 10000 次循环,PEEK TSC 的固位力也足以稳定牙种植体。