Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, New York.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2020 Sep 1;41(5):336-340. doi: 10.2500/aap.2020.41.200061.
Serum Peanut-specific-IgE (PN-sIgE) and peanut-component-resolved-diagnostics (CRD) are often ordered simultaneously in the evaluation for peanut allergy. Results often guide the plans for peanut oral challenge. However, the clinical utility of CRD at different total PN-sIgE levels is unclear. A commonly used predefined CRD Ara h2 cutoff value in the literature predicting probability of peanut challenge outcomes is 0.35kUA/L. To examine the utility of CRD in patients with and without a history of clinical reactivity to peanut (PN). This was a retrospective chart review of 196 children with PN-sIgE and CRD testing, of which, 98 patients had a clinical history of an IgE-mediated reaction when exposed to PN and 98 did not. The Fisher's exact test was used to assess the relationship between CRD and PN-sIgE at different cutoff levels, McNemar test and Gwet's approach (AC1 statistic) were used to examine agreement between CRD and PN-sIgE, and logistic regression was used to assess differences in the findings between patients with and without reaction history. Ara h 1, 2, 3, or 9 (ARAH) levels ≤0.35 kUA/L were significantly associated with PN-sIgE levels <2 kUA/L rather than ≥2 kUA/L (p < 0.0001). When the ARAH threshold was increased to 1 kUA/L and 2 kUA/L, these thresholds were still significantly associated with PN-sIgE levels of <2, <5, and <14 kUA/L. These findings were not significantly different in patients with and without a history of clinical reactivity. ARAH values correlated with PN-sIgE. Regardless of clinical history, ARAH levels are unlikely to be below 0.35, 1, or 2 kUA/L if the PN-sIgE level is >2 kUA/L. Thus, if possible, practitioners should consider PN-sIgE rather than automatically ordering CRD with PN-sIgE every time. Laboratory procedures that allow automatically and reflexively adding CRD when the PN-sIgE level is ≤5 kUA/L can be helpful. However, further studies are needed in subjects with challenge-proven PN allergy.
血清花生特异性 IgE(PN-sIgE)和花生成分解析诊断(CRD)常用于评估花生过敏。结果通常指导花生口服挑战计划。然而,在不同的总 PN-sIgE 水平下,CRD 的临床效用尚不清楚。文献中常用的预定义 CRD Ara h2 截断值可预测花生挑战结果的概率为 0.35kUA/L。 研究 CRD 在有和无花生临床反应史患者中的作用。 这是一项对 196 例具有 PN-sIgE 和 CRD 检测的儿童进行的回顾性图表审查,其中 98 例患者在接触 PN 时发生 IgE 介导的反应,98 例患者没有。Fisher 精确检验用于评估不同截断值下 CRD 与 PN-sIgE 之间的关系,McNemar 检验和 Gwet 方法(AC1 统计量)用于检验 CRD 与 PN-sIgE 之间的一致性,Logistic 回归用于评估有和无反应史患者之间发现的差异。 Ara h 1、2、3 或 9(ARAH)水平≤0.35 kUA/L 与 PN-sIgE 水平<2 kUA/L 而非≥2 kUA/L 显著相关(p<0.0001)。当 ARAH 阈值增加到 1 kUA/L 和 2 kUA/L 时,这些阈值仍然与 PN-sIgE 水平<2、<5 和<14 kUA/L 显著相关。在有和无临床反应史的患者中,这些发现没有显著差异。 ARAH 值与 PN-sIgE 相关。无论是否有临床反应史,如果 PN-sIgE 水平>2 kUA/L,则 ARAH 水平不太可能低于 0.35、1 或 2 kUA/L。因此,如果可能的话,临床医生应考虑在每次 PN-sIgE 时都考虑 PN-sIgE,而不是自动下 CRD 医嘱。当 PN-sIgE 水平≤5 kUA/L 时,实验室程序可以自动和反射性地添加 CRD,这可能会有所帮助。然而,还需要在经挑战证实的 PN 过敏患者中进行进一步的研究。