Suppr超能文献

参与美国病理学家学会实验室认证计划可降低 B 淋巴细胞白血病和浆细胞骨髓瘤流式细胞术微小残留病检测的变异性:一项随访调查。

Participation in the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program Decreases Variability in B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Plasma Cell Myeloma Flow Cytometric Minimal Residual Disease Testing: A Follow-up Survey.

机构信息

From the Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis (Hupp, Linden).

College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Bashleben, Long).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;145(3):336-342. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0493-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing by flow cytometry is ubiquitous in hematolymphoid neoplasm monitoring, especially B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), for which it provides predictive information and guides management. Major heterogeneity was identified in 2014. Subsequently, new Flow Cytometry Checklist items required documentation of the sensitivity determination method and required lower level of detection (LLOD) inclusion in final reports. This study assesses Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP) participation and new checklist items' impact on flow cytometry MRD testing.

OBJECTIVES.—: To survey flow cytometry laboratories about MRD testing for B-ALL and plasma cell myeloma. In particular, enumerate the laboratories performing MRD testing, the proportion performing assays with very low LLODs, and implementation of new checklist items.

DESIGN.—: Supplemental questions were distributed in the 2017-A mailing to 548 flow cytometry laboratories subscribed to the College of American Pathologists FL3 Proficiency Testing Survey (Flow Cytometry-Immunophenotypic Characterization of Leukemia/Lymphoma).

RESULTS.—: The percentage of laboratories performing MRD studies has significantly decreased since 2014. Wide ranges of LLOD and collection event numbers were reported for B-ALL and plasma cell myeloma. Most laboratories determine LLOD by using dilutional studies and include it in final reports; a higher proportion of LAP participants used these practices than nonparticipants.

CONCLUSIONS.—: Several MRD testing aspects vary among laboratories receiving FL3 Proficiency Testing materials. After the survey in 2014, new checklist items were implemented. As compared to 2014, fewer laboratories are performing MRD studies. While LLOD remains heterogeneous, a high proportion of LAP subscribers follow the new checklist requirements and, overall, target LLOD recommendations from disease-specific working groups are met.

摘要

背景

流式细胞术检测微小残留病(MRD)在血液淋巴肿瘤监测中无处不在,尤其是在 B 淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)中,它提供了预测信息并指导治疗。2014 年,人们发现了该领域的主要异质性。随后,新的流式细胞术检查表条目需要记录灵敏度确定方法,并在最终报告中包含更低的检测下限(LLO)。本研究评估了实验室认证计划(LAP)的参与情况以及新检查表条目对流式细胞术 MRD 检测的影响。

目的

调查 B-ALL 和浆细胞骨髓瘤的流式细胞术 MRD 检测情况。具体来说,列举正在进行 MRD 检测的实验室、进行具有极低 LLOD 检测限的检测的比例以及新检查表条目的实施情况。

设计

在 2017-A 邮件中向美国病理学家学院流式细胞术免疫表型特征白血病/淋巴瘤 3 次能力验证调查(Flow Cytometry-Immunophenotypic Characterization of Leukemia/Lymphoma)订阅的 548 个流式细胞术实验室分发补充问题。

结果

自 2014 年以来,进行 MRD 研究的实验室比例显著下降。B-ALL 和浆细胞骨髓瘤的 LLOD 和采集事件数量报告范围很广。大多数实验室通过稀释研究来确定 LLOD,并将其纳入最终报告;与非参与者相比,更多的 LAP 参与者采用了这些实践。

结论

接受 FL3 能力验证材料的实验室之间存在多种 MRD 检测方面的差异。在 2014 年的调查之后,新的检查表条目已被实施。与 2014 年相比,进行 MRD 研究的实验室数量减少。虽然 LLOD 仍然存在异质性,但 LAP 订阅者的很大一部分遵循新的检查表要求,总体上符合特定疾病工作组的 LLOD 建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验