Suppr超能文献

脑室炎经脑室灌洗治疗后的疗效改善:一项前瞻性对照研究。

Outcome improvement in cerebral ventriculitis after ventricular irrigation: a prospective controlled study.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; and.

2Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Sep 4;26(6):682-690. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.PEDS2063. Print 2020 Dec 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral ventriculitis remains one of the most challenging neurosurgical conditions, with poor outcome and a long course of treatment and duration of hospital stay. Despite the current conventional management plans, i.e., using antibiotics in addition to CSF drainage, the outcome remains unsatisfactory in some cases, with no definitive therapeutic guidelines. This study aims to compare the outcome of ventricular irrigation/lavage (endoscopic irrigation or the double-drain technique) to conventional currently accepted therapy using just drainage and antibiotics.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective controlled study in 33 patients with cerebral ventriculitis in which most of the cases were complications of CSF shunt operations. Patients were divided into two groups. Removal of the ventricular catheter whenever present was performed in both groups. The first group was managed by ventricular lavage/irrigation, while the other group was managed using conventional therapy by inserting an external ventricular drain. Both systemic and intraventricular antibiotics were used in both groups. The outcomes were compared regarding mortality rate, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 5.98 ± 7.02 years. The mean follow-up duration was 7.6 ± 3.2 months in the conventional group and 5.7 ± 3.4 months in the lavage group. The mortality rate was 25% (4/16) in the lavage group and 52.9% (9/17) in the nonlavage group (p = 0.1). The mRS score was less than 3 (good outcome) in 68.8% (11/16) of the lavage group cases and in 23.5% (4/17) of the conventional group (p < 0.05). The mean hospital stay duration was 20.5 ± 14.2 days in the lavage group, whereas it was 39.7 ± 16.9 days in the conventional group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular lavage or irrigation together with antibiotics is useful in the management of cerebral ventriculitis and associated with a better outcome and shorter hospital stay duration compared to current conventional lines of treatment.

摘要

目的

脑室炎仍然是最具挑战性的神经外科病症之一,其治疗效果差,治疗过程和住院时间长。尽管目前采用了常规的治疗方案,即在使用抗生素的同时进行脑脊液引流,但在某些情况下治疗效果仍不理想,目前尚无明确的治疗指南。本研究旨在比较脑室冲洗/灌洗(内镜冲洗或双引流技术)与仅使用引流和抗生素的传统治疗方法的效果。

方法

作者对 33 例脑室炎患者进行了前瞻性对照研究,其中大多数病例是脑脊液分流术的并发症。患者被分为两组。两组均在存在脑室导管时将其取出。第一组采用脑室灌洗/冲洗治疗,而另一组则采用插入外部脑室引流管的传统方法进行治疗。两组均使用全身和脑室内抗生素。比较两组的死亡率、改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分和住院时间。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为 5.98 ± 7.02 岁。常规组的平均随访时间为 7.6 ± 3.2 个月,灌洗组为 5.7 ± 3.4 个月。灌洗组的死亡率为 25%(4/16),非灌洗组为 52.9%(9/17)(p = 0.1)。灌洗组 mRS 评分小于 3 分(预后良好)的比例为 68.8%(11/16),常规组为 23.5%(4/17)(p < 0.05)。灌洗组的平均住院时间为 20.5 ± 14.2 天,常规组为 39.7 ± 16.9 天(p < 0.05)。

结论

脑室灌洗或冲洗联合抗生素治疗对脑室炎及其相关疾病的治疗是有效的,与目前的常规治疗方法相比,可获得更好的治疗效果和更短的住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验