J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):1001-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Self-reported behavior change is used to evaluate the effectiveness of educational outreach interventions delivered to clinicians, such as academic detailing (AD). However, self-reported changes in behavior are often not corroborated with data on actual behavior change. To assess alignment between self-reported practice change intentions and actual opioid prescribing behavior among primary care clinicians after an AD intervention.
We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare pre-post changes in opioid prescribing using data from the Illinois Prescription Monitoring Program. An opioid-focused AD intervention was delivered to primary care clinicians from a large health system in the Chicago metropolitan area from June 2018 to August 2018. Immediately after the AD intervention, clinicians were administered a single-item self-reported practice change measure. Clinicians were categorized into 2 groups on the basis of their responses: (1) intention to change and (2) no-to-moderate intention to change. Outcomes were mean total opioid prescriptions and high-dose opioid prescriptions (≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents) per clinician per month. Repeated measures linear regression models were used to compare changes in opioid prescribing outcomes between the 2 groups in the 6 months before and after the AD intervention.
A total of 149 clinicians were included for analysis. An intention to change was reported by 72 clinicians and no-to-moderate intention to change was reported by 77 clinicians. In the 6 months after the AD intervention, there were 1.48 (95% CI -2.48 to -0.47) fewer total opioid prescriptions and 0.50 (-0.69 to -0.31) fewer high-dose opioid prescriptions per clinician per month in the intention to change group than in the no-to-moderate intention to change group.
This study showed considerable alignment between self-reported practice change intentions and actual changes in opioid prescribing behavior. Future opioid-focused educational outreach interventions should consider using standardized single-item practice change measures as an immediate indicator of future behavior change.
通过自我报告的行为改变来评估向临床医生(如学术详述(AD))提供的教育外展干预的效果。然而,自我报告的行为变化往往与实际行为变化的数据不符。评估在 AD 干预后,初级保健临床医生的自我报告的实践改变意向与实际阿片类药物处方行为之间的一致性。
我们使用差异中的差异方法,使用来自伊利诺伊州处方监测计划的数据比较阿片类药物处方的前后变化。2018 年 6 月至 2018 年 8 月,从芝加哥大都市区的一家大型医疗系统向初级保健临床医生提供了以阿片类药物为重点的 AD 干预。在 AD 干预后,立即对临床医生进行了一项关于实践改变意向的单一项目自我报告实践改变措施。根据他们的回答,将临床医生分为 2 组:(1)改变意向,(2)无到适度改变意向。结果是每个临床医生每月的总阿片类药物处方和高剂量阿片类药物处方(≥90 吗啡毫克当量)。使用重复测量线性回归模型比较 AD 干预前后 6 个月内两组之间的阿片类药物处方结果变化。
共有 149 名临床医生被纳入分析。72 名临床医生报告了改变意向,77 名临床医生报告了无到适度改变意向。在 AD 干预后的 6 个月内,意向改变组每个临床医生每月的总阿片类药物处方减少了 1.48(95%CI-2.48 至-0.47),高剂量阿片类药物处方减少了 0.50(-0.69 至-0.31)。
本研究表明,自我报告的实践改变意向与阿片类药物处方行为的实际变化之间存在相当大的一致性。未来以阿片类药物为重点的教育外展干预措施应考虑使用标准化的单一项目实践改变措施作为未来行为改变的即时指标。