1JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Intensive Care Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 3Intensive Care Unit, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Australia.
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Aug;18(8):1751-1759. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00196.
This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients.
Occult pneumothorax is air within the pleural cavity that is diagnosed on a CT scan but was not suspected on the basis of preceding clinical examination or supine chest x-ray. Currently, there is no consensus on how to manage occult pneumothoraces, especially in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. It is common practice to place a prophylactic intercostal catheter to stop the potential development of a tension pneumothorax; however, there is a 20% risk of major complications from the intercostal catheter insertion. Recent evidence suggests that occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients can be managed conservatively, rather than using a prophylactic intercostal catheter as first-line management.
This review will include studies investigating stable patients of all ages who were diagnosed with traumatic occult pneumothorax via CT scan, received mechanical ventilation, and underwent either conservative management or intercostal catheter insertion.
Eligible studies will include randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched. International Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for unpublished studies. All included studies will be critically appraised using standardized JBI tools, with no exclusions based on methodological quality. Studies will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, with impact of methodological quality to be explored through sensitivity analysis.
本系统评价旨在综合现有证据,调查机械通气患者隐匿性气胸的保守治疗的效果和安全性。
隐匿性气胸是指胸腔内存在的空气,通过 CT 扫描诊断,但在前次临床检查或仰卧位胸部 X 线片上并未怀疑。目前,对于隐匿性气胸的处理方法尚无共识,尤其是对于需要机械通气的患者。常规做法是放置预防性肋间引流管以阻止张力性气胸的发展;然而,肋间引流管插入存在 20%的重大并发症风险。最近的证据表明,机械通气患者的隐匿性气胸可以保守治疗,而不是使用预防性肋间引流管作为一线治疗。
本综述将纳入研究对象为所有年龄的稳定患者,通过 CT 扫描诊断为创伤性隐匿性气胸,接受机械通气,并接受保守治疗或肋间引流管插入治疗。
合格的研究将包括随机和非随机对照试验,以及前瞻性和回顾性队列研究。将在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库中进行搜索。还将在国际临床试验注册处、澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册处以及 ClinicalTrials.gov 中搜索未发表的研究。所有纳入的研究将使用标准化的 JBI 工具进行批判性评估,不根据方法学质量进行排除。如果可能,将对研究进行统计学荟萃分析,并通过敏感性分析探讨方法学质量的影响。