• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Underlying factors relating to acute myocardial infarction for coronary artery ectasia patients.冠状动脉扩张患者急性心肌梗死的相关潜在因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021983.
2
Is Coronary Artery Ectasia a Thrombotic Disease?冠状动脉扩张是一种血栓形成性疾病吗?
Angiology. 2019 Jan;70(1):62-68. doi: 10.1177/0003319718782807. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
Patterns of coronary artery ectasia and short-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中冠状动脉扩张的模式及短期预后
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jun;48(3):161-6. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2014.902495. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
4
Coronary ectasia in different scenarios, primarily in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.不同情况下的冠状动脉扩张,主要是在伴有非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的心肌梗死中。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023 Mar 1;24(3):167-171. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001445.
5
Prevalence and Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction.冠状动脉瘤患者急性心肌梗死的患病率及长期预后。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;156:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.037. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
6
Coronary Artery Ectasia in the Pathophysiology of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.冠状动脉扩张在非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死的病理生理学中的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 May 15;171:28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.01.043. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
A new inflammatory marker: elevated eosinophil-tolymphocyte ratio associated with presence and severity of isolated coronary artery ectasia.一种新的炎症标志物:嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高与孤立性冠状动脉瘤的存在和严重程度相关。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2020 Sep/Oct;31(5):227-235. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2019-049. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
[The characteristics of high density lipoprotein cholesterol and the relationship between high density lipoprotein cholesterol and the severity of coronary artery lesions in young men with acute myocardial infarction].[急性心肌梗死青年男性高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的特点及其与冠状动脉病变严重程度的关系]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 May 21;93(19):1458-62.
9
Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Stenoses, Markis Class, and Ectasia Ratio in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia.冠状动脉扩张患者中冠状动脉狭窄、Markis分级及扩张率的预后价值
Cardiology. 2015;131(4):251-9. doi: 10.1159/000381702. Epub 2015 May 12.
10
Five-years' prognostic analysis for coronary artery ectasia patients with coronary atherosclerosis: A retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉粥样硬化合并冠状动脉扩张患者的五年预后分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 11;9:950291. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.950291. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic exposure to high altitude and the presence of coronary ectasia in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.慢性高原暴露与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉扩张的关系
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2023 Dec 27;4(4):151-156. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i4.329. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Five-years' prognostic analysis for coronary artery ectasia patients with coronary atherosclerosis: A retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉粥样硬化合并冠状动脉扩张患者的五年预后分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 11;9:950291. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.950291. eCollection 2022.
3
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉扩张中的炎症生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;12(5):1026. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051026.
4
Distribution Characteristics of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Culprit Lesion in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Based on Coronary Angiography Diagnosis.基于冠状动脉造影诊断的急性心肌梗死患者 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死罪犯病变的分布特征。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Feb 2;2022:2420586. doi: 10.1155/2022/2420586. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Coronary Artery Ectasia a Thrombotic Disease?冠状动脉扩张是一种血栓形成性疾病吗?
Angiology. 2019 Jan;70(1):62-68. doi: 10.1177/0003319718782807. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
The Role of Osteoprotegerin as a Cardioprotective Versus Reactive Inflammatory Marker: the Chicken or the Egg Paradox.骨保护素作为心肌保护与反应性炎症标志物的作用:鸡与蛋的悖论。
Balkan Med J. 2018 May 29;35(3):225-232. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2018.0579. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Long-term prognostic significance of pentraxin-3 in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 5-year prospective cohort study.五聚体蛋白3在急性心肌梗死患者中的长期预后意义:一项5年前瞻性队列研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Mar;17(3):202-209. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7307. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
4
Coronary artery ectasia: new insights into pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.冠状动脉扩张:病理生理学、诊断及治疗新见解
Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Aug;27(5):420-8. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000379.
5
Coronary Artery Ectasia-A Review of Current Literature.冠状动脉扩张——当前文献综述
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2016;12(4):318-323. doi: 10.2174/1573403x12666160504100159.
6
Characterization of vascular phenotype in patients with coronary artery ectasia: The role of endothelial dysfunction.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:138-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.046. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
The relation between coronary artery ectasia and psychological-environmental factors.冠状动脉扩张与心理环境因素之间的关系。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr;28(2):127-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
The relationship between serum bilirubin concentration and coronary artery ectasia.血清胆红素浓度与冠状动脉扩张之间的关系。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(3):202-5. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.54014. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Comments on the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-segment Elevation.对2015年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南的评论
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Dec;68(12):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.11.001.
10
Comparison of outcomes of diseased coronary arteries ectasia, stenosis and combined.病变冠状动脉扩张、狭窄及合并病变的预后比较。
Res Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Jan 20;4(1):e25206. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.25206. eCollection 2015 Feb.

冠状动脉扩张患者急性心肌梗死的相关潜在因素。

Underlying factors relating to acute myocardial infarction for coronary artery ectasia patients.

作者信息

Sheng Qianqian, Zhao Huiqiang, Wu Shanshan, Liu Ruifeng

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021983.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000021983
PMID:32899042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7478456/
Abstract

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients were more prone to present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), this case-control research aimed to explore the underlying factors relating AMI for them.This study investigated a serial of 119 patients who underwent coronary angiography and were diagnosed as CAE between the years 2016 and 2017 at the Beijing Friendship Hospital; 32 of the patients developed AMI and 87 did not develop AMI. The possible factors relating to AMI, including disease history, cardiovascular risk factors, thrombotic condition, inflammation status, and coronary imaging characteristics, were comprehensively compared between CAE patients with and without AMI.CAE patients with AMI had a lower antiplatelet rate, a higher blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, increased neutrophil to lymphocyte (NL) ratio, higher Gensini score, and larger proportions of Markis type II. Logistic regression analysis also indicated that AMI history, lower antiplatelet rate, higher NL ratio, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and Gensini score, as well as Markis type II were associated with AMI in CAE patients.AMI history, lower antiplatelet treatment rates, poor blood lipid control and higher coronary stenosis extent, higher inflammatory response, and Markis type II were closely related to the incidence of AMI in CAE patients.

摘要

冠状动脉扩张(CAE)患者更容易发生急性心肌梗死(AMI),本病例对照研究旨在探讨其发生AMI的潜在因素。本研究调查了2016年至2017年间在北京友谊医院接受冠状动脉造影并被诊断为CAE的119例患者;其中32例患者发生了AMI,87例未发生AMI。对发生AMI和未发生AMI的CAE患者,全面比较了与AMI相关的可能因素,包括病史、心血管危险因素、血栓形成情况、炎症状态和冠状动脉影像学特征。发生AMI的CAE患者抗血小板率较低、血液低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较高、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞(NL)比值升高、Gensini评分较高,且Markis II型比例较大。Logistic回归分析还表明,AMI病史、较低的抗血小板率、较高的NL比值、较高的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平和Gensini评分以及Markis II型与CAE患者发生AMI有关。AMI病史、较低的抗血小板治疗率、血脂控制不佳、较高的冠状动脉狭窄程度、较高的炎症反应以及Markis II型与CAE患者AMI的发生率密切相关。