Bojo Canales Cristina, Sanz-Valero Javier
Biblioteca Nacional de Ciencias de la Salud. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Madrid. España.
Escuela Nacional de Medicina del Trabajo. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Madrid. España.
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Sep 9;94:e202009110.
The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the quality of scientific journals is a general practice in all areas of science. The WoS and Scopus databases continue to be the reference sources to obtain bibliographic indicators. Others such as SciELO network offer indicators about Ibero-American science, which are scarcely collected in WoS and Scopus. The aim of this work was to analyze the association of the indicators proposed by SciELO for health sciences journals, with the most widely used impact and indicators and to study the complementarity of the existing prestige indicators.
Analytical correlational study between SciELO indicators, with impact and prestige indicators from Journal Citation Report, Scopus and Web of Science. The results refer to 2018, the most recent and complete data available. Association between the qualitative variables was analyzed using the chi-square test, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the quantitative variables using the Tukey method as a post hoc test. To obtain the relationship between quantitative variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used and Spearman's coefficient for ordinal variables. The level of significance used in all the hypothesis tests was α≤0.05.
The SciELO Impact Factor showed a weak correlation both, with Journal Citation Report (R=0.36; p=0.003), and Scopus Cite Score (R=0.39; p=0.001). The association between the H index of the Web of Science andthe H index of Scopus with the H index of SciELO was weak in both cases (R=0.45; p<0.001 and R=0.340; p=0.003).
Indicators proposed by SciELO, for health journals, did not show an association with those of WoS or Scopus. The weak correlation between Impact Factor and Cite Score with SciELO Impact Factor, converts the latter into a necessary "metrics" to assess journals excluded from the "mainstream" and fundamentally those from the Latin American region. The need of using the prestige indicators to fill in the impact indicators, has not been proven in this study.
使用文献计量指标来衡量科学期刊的质量是所有科学领域的普遍做法。科学网(WoS)和Scopus数据库仍然是获取文献计量指标的参考来源。其他如科学电子图书馆在线(SciELO)网络提供有关伊比利亚美洲科学的指标,而这些指标在WoS和Scopus中很少收集。这项工作的目的是分析SciELO为健康科学期刊提出的指标与最广泛使用的影响力指标之间的关联,并研究现有声誉指标的互补性。
对SciELO指标与来自《期刊引证报告》、Scopus和科学网的影响力及声誉指标进行分析性相关研究。结果参考的是2018年,这是可获得的最新且完整的数据。使用卡方检验分析定性变量之间的关联,对定量变量使用方差分析(ANOVA),并使用Tukey方法作为事后检验。为了获得定量变量之间的关系,使用Pearson相关系数,对于有序变量使用Spearman系数。所有假设检验中使用的显著性水平为α≤0.05。
SciELO影响因子与《期刊引证报告》(R = 0.36;p = 0.003)以及Scopus CiteScore(R = 0.39;p = 0.001)均呈现弱相关性。科学网的H指数和Scopus的H指数与SciELO的H指数之间的关联在两种情况下均较弱(R = 0.45;p < 0.001和R = 0.340;p = 0.003)。
SciELO为健康期刊提出的指标与科学网或Scopus的指标未显示出关联。影响因子和CiteScore与SciELO影响因子之间的弱相关性,使得后者成为评估被排除在“主流”之外的期刊(从根本上来说是拉丁美洲地区的期刊)的必要“指标”。本研究尚未证明使用声誉指标来补充影响指标的必要性。