• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多组分干预措施预防住院老年人群谵妄的Meta 分析。

Multicomponent Interventions for the Prevention of Delirium in Hospitalized Older People: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Canarian Foundation Institute of Health Research of Canary Islands (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Health Services and Chronic Diseases Research Network (REDISSEC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2947-2954. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16768. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.16768
PMID:32902909
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively assess the effects of multicomponent interventions for prevention of delirium in hospitalized older people.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methods.

PARTICIPANTS

All randomized controlled trials were included. Included studies were conducted in hospitalized older people (aged ≥65 years).

MEASUREMENTS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were consulted (search date: 2015 to March 2019). Predefined criteria were used to determine inclusion of studies and to assess their methodologic quality.

RESULTS

From 1,250 records identified, 10 randomized controlled trials were included (n = 2,850: 1355 medical patients, 1,243 surgical, and 160 intensive care unit). The multicomponent interventions, compared with usual care, reduced the incidence of delirium (risk ratio (RR) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.72; I = 0%; k = 10; n = 2,758), duration of delirium (RR = -1.18; 95% CI = -1.95 to -0.40; I = 45%; k = 6; n = 276), severity of delirium (standard mean difference = -0.98; 95% CI = -1.46 to -0.49; I = 0%; k = 3; n = 82), and pressure ulcers (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26-0.88; I = 0%; k = 2; n = 457).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium are effective in decreasing its incidence, duration, and severity; as well as the incidence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized older people. Therefore, multicomponent interventions hold great promise to impact in the most important and prevalent conditions affecting fragile older people during hospitalization.

摘要

目的

全面评估多组分干预措施预防住院老年人谵妄的效果。

设计

系统评价,采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目方法进行荟萃分析。

参与者

所有随机对照试验均包括在内。纳入的研究对象为住院老年人(年龄≥65 岁)。

测量方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库(检索日期:2015 年至 2019 年 3 月)。使用预设标准确定纳入研究并评估其方法学质量。

结果

从 1250 条记录中,确定了 10 项随机对照试验(n = 2850:1355 例内科患者、1243 例外科患者和 160 例重症监护病房患者)。与常规护理相比,多组分干预措施降低了谵妄的发生率(风险比(RR)= 0.62;95%置信区间(CI)= 0.54-0.72;I = 0%;k = 10;n = 2758)、谵妄持续时间(RR = -1.18;95%CI = -1.95 至-0.40;I = 45%;k = 6;n = 276)、谵妄严重程度(标准均数差=-0.98;95%CI = -1.46 至-0.49;I = 0%;k = 3;n = 82)和压疮(RR = 0.48;95%CI = 0.26-0.88;I = 0%;k = 2;n = 457)。

结论

荟萃分析表明,多组分干预措施预防谵妄可有效降低其发生率、持续时间和严重程度;以及住院老年人压疮的发生率。因此,多组分干预措施有望对影响住院期间脆弱老年人最常见和最严重的疾病产生重大影响。

相似文献

1
Multicomponent Interventions for the Prevention of Delirium in Hospitalized Older People: A Meta-Analysis.多组分干预措施预防住院老年人群谵妄的Meta 分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2947-2954. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16768. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Pharmacologic interventions for prevention of delirium in hospitalized older people: A meta-analysis.药物干预预防住院老年人谵妄:荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Sep-Oct;90:104171. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104171. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
3
Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long-term care.机构长期照护中预防老年人谵妄的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD009537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009537.pub3.
4
Multicomponent intervention strategies for managing delirium in hospitalized older people: systematic review.用于管理住院老年人谵妄的多组分干预策略:系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(1):79-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03557.x.
5
Strategies for prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.术后谵妄的预防策略:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 18;17(2):R47. doi: 10.1186/cc12566.
6
Non-Pharmacologic Multicomponent Interventions Preventing Delirium in Hospitalized People.非药物多组分干预措施预防住院患者谵妄。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1864-1871. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16565. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房促进睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.
8
Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions on incidence of delirium in hospitalized older patients with hip fracture: a systematic review.多组分干预措施对髋部骨折住院老年患者谵妄发生率的影响:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Apr;30(4):481-492. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002782. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in critically ill adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.非药物干预措施预防危重症成人谵妄的效果比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jul;131:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104239. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Effects of non-pharmacologic prevention on delirium in critically ill patients: A network meta-analysis.非药物预防对危重症患者谵妄的影响:网状荟萃分析。
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Sep;28(5):727-737. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12780. Epub 2022 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Dexmedetomidine increases the risk of delirium in critically ill patients: A propensity score analysis.右美托咪定增加重症患者谵妄风险:一项倾向评分分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42589. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042589.
2
Mortality Risk Following Delirium in Older Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年住院患者谵妄后的死亡风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Jun;22(3):e70027. doi: 10.1111/wvn.70027.
3
A randomized pilot and feasibility trial of live and recorded music interventions for management of delirium symptoms in acute geriatric patients.
一项针对老年急性病患者谵妄症状管理的现场音乐和录制音乐干预的随机试点及可行性试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 2;25(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05954-1.
4
Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal cohort study on the incidence of dementia after the onset of delirium in patients with mild cognitive impairment: MDDCohort (Mild Cognitive Impairment Delirium Dementia).一项关于轻度认知障碍患者谵妄后痴呆发病率的前瞻性、纵向队列研究方案:MDDCohort(轻度认知障碍谵妄痴呆队列)。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):922. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05480-6.
5
Nutritional status and triglyceride-glucose index influence delirium in elderly heart failure patients.营养状况和甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数影响老年心力衰竭患者的谵妄。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77573-6.
6
Management of delirium in acute stroke patients: a position paper by the Austrian Stroke Society on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.急性卒中患者谵妄的管理:奥地利卒中协会关于预防、诊断和治疗的立场文件
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Aug 19;17:17562864241258788. doi: 10.1177/17562864241258788. eCollection 2024.
7
Delirium prevalence and delirium literacy across Italian hospital wards: a secondary analysis of data from the World Delirium Awareness Day 2023.意大利医院各病房的谵妄患病率及谵妄认知水平:对2023年世界谵妄认知日数据的二次分析
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1405-1413. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01019-5. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
8
Delirium in patients with COVID-19 treated in the intensive care unit.COVID-19 患者在重症监护病房中出现的意识混乱。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0289662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289662. eCollection 2023.
9
The Confusion Assessment Method Could Be More Accurate than the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale for Diagnosing Delirium in Older Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study.《混乱评估方法可能比纪念谵妄评估量表更能准确诊断老年癌症患者的谵妄:一项探索性研究》。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;30(9):8245-8254. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090598.
10
Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer-A Systematic Review.癌症老年患者谵妄筛查工具的准确性——一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 17;15(10):2807. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102807.