Suppr超能文献

用于预测儿科重症监护病房压力性溃疡风险的Braden QD量表测试。

Testing of Braden QD Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

作者信息

Puspitasari Jayanti Dwi, Nurhaeni Nani, Waluyanti Fajar Tri

机构信息

Faculty of Nusing, Universitas Indonesia.

Dr. R. Soedjati Soemodiarjo Hospital, Grobogan, Indonesia.

出版信息

Pediatr Rep. 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8694. doi: 10.4081/pr.2020.8694.

Abstract

Children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for pressure injury due to immobility and the challenge of positioning medical devices. However, a comprehensive instrument to assess pressure injury risk is still finite. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Braden QD Scale. The design used was a Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha (α). Fifty-one pediatric patients below age 18 who had been bedridden for at least 24 hours were engaged through a method. The results showed assessments made by using the Braden QD Scale revealed that 88.2% of patients were at risk for a pressure injury. The validity test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.532 and 0.833. The reliability test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.756 and 0.834. The sensitivity value is 100%, specificity value is 40%. In general, the study finding suggests that the Braden QD Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for predicting pressure injury risk. Nurses may employ this tool to assess pressure injury risk in pediatric patients.

摘要

入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童因活动受限和放置医疗设备的挑战而面临发生压疮的风险。然而,用于评估压疮风险的综合工具仍然有限。本研究旨在测试布拉登QD量表的有效性和可靠性。采用的设计方法是皮尔逊相关系数和克朗巴哈系数(α)。通过一种方法纳入了51名18岁以下且卧床至少24小时的儿科患者。结果显示,使用布拉登QD量表进行的评估表明,88.2%的患者有发生压疮的风险。布拉登QD量表的效度测试结果在0.532至0.833之间。布拉登QD量表的信度测试结果在0.756至0.834之间。敏感度值为100%,特异度值为40%。总体而言,研究结果表明布拉登QD量表是预测压疮风险的有效且可靠的工具。护士可使用该工具评估儿科患者的压疮风险。

相似文献

1
Testing of Braden QD Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Pediatr Rep. 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8694. doi: 10.4081/pr.2020.8694.
5
Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:189-195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.045.
7
Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):22-33. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200301000-00004.
9
CE: How to Predict Pediatric Pressure Injury Risk with the Braden QD Scale.
Am J Nurs. 2018 Nov;118(11):34-43. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000547638.92908.de.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Oct 10;5(4):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.08.003.
2
CE: How to Predict Pediatric Pressure Injury Risk with the Braden QD Scale.
Am J Nurs. 2018 Nov;118(11):34-43. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000547638.92908.de.
3
Prevalence of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population and in primary health care: An epidemiological study conducted in Spain.
J Tissue Viability. 2018 Nov;27(4):221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
5
Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:189-195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.045.
6
Medical-Device Related Pressure Injuries to Children in the Intensive Care Unit.
Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2017;40(sup1):69-77. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2017.1386973.
7
Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia.
J Tissue Viability. 2017 Nov;26(4):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
8
Risk factors for pressure injuries among critical care patients: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population.
J Tissue Viability. 2016 May;25(2):127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验