• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Testing of Braden QD Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.用于预测儿科重症监护病房压力性溃疡风险的Braden QD量表测试。
Pediatr Rep. 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8694. doi: 10.4081/pr.2020.8694.
2
[Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale].[儿科患者压疮风险评估量表:Braden QD量表的法语翻译、内部一致性、收敛效度、可行性及临床效用]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2022;149(2):51-61. doi: 10.3917/rsi.149.0051.
3
Predictive validity and reliability of two pressure injury risk assessment scales at a neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿重症监护病房中两种压力性损伤风险评估量表的预测效度和信度
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 5;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14430.
4
Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.重症监护病房压力性损伤风险评估:Braden 量表和 Jackson/Cubbin 量表的可靠性和预测效度比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4595-4605. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15054. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.预测儿科患者的压力性损伤风险:布拉登QD量表
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:189-195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.045.
6
A Comparison of the Braden Q and the Braden QD Scale to Assess Pediatric Risk for Pressure Injuries During Noninvasive Ventilation.Braden Q 与 Braden QD 量表在评估无创通气期间小儿压力性损伤风险中的比较。
Respir Care. 2021 Aug;66(8):1234-1239. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08536. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.预测儿科患者的压疮风险:布拉登Q量表。
Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):22-33. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200301000-00004.
8
The Chinese Mandarin COMHON Index and Braden Scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: An inter-rater reliability and convergent validity study.用于评估重症监护中压力性损伤风险的中文普通话COMHON指数和Braden量表:一项评分者间信度和收敛效度研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2025 Jan;38(1):101093. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
CE: How to Predict Pediatric Pressure Injury Risk with the Braden QD Scale.CE:如何使用布瑞登儿童版量表预测儿科压力性损伤风险。
Am J Nurs. 2018 Nov;118(11):34-43. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000547638.92908.de.
10
Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.重症监护压力性溃疡风险评估:Braden 和 Waterlow 量表及两个重症监护病房主观评估的评分者间信度和效度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Indian academy of pediatrics (neonatology chapter) recommendations for evidence-based neonatal skincare and protocols for hospitalized neonates.印度儿科学会(新生儿学分会)关于循证新生儿皮肤护理的建议及住院新生儿护理方案
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jun 12;13:1433792. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1433792. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive validity and reliability of two pressure injury risk assessment scales at a neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿重症监护病房中两种压力性损伤风险评估量表的预测效度和信度
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 5;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14430.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.布拉登儿童压疮风险评估量表(Braden Q Scale)在儿科压疮风险评估中的预测准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Oct 10;5(4):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.08.003.
2
CE: How to Predict Pediatric Pressure Injury Risk with the Braden QD Scale.CE:如何使用布瑞登儿童版量表预测儿科压力性损伤风险。
Am J Nurs. 2018 Nov;118(11):34-43. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000547638.92908.de.
3
Prevalence of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population and in primary health care: An epidemiological study conducted in Spain.西班牙儿科人群及初级卫生保健中压疮的患病率:一项流行病学研究
J Tissue Viability. 2018 Nov;27(4):221-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
4
Implementation of a Nurse Driven Pathway to Reduce Incidence of Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries in the Pediatric Intensive Care Setting.实施护士主导的路径以降低儿科重症监护环境中医院获得性压力性损伤的发生率。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Jul-Aug;41:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.预测儿科患者的压力性损伤风险:布拉登QD量表
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:189-195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.045.
6
Medical-Device Related Pressure Injuries to Children in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中儿童的医疗器械相关压力性损伤
Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2017;40(sup1):69-77. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2017.1386973.
7
Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia.医疗器械相关压力性损伤:澳大利亚一家急性三级医院的探索性描述性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2017 Nov;26(4):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
8
Risk factors for pressure injuries among critical care patients: A systematic review.重症监护患者发生压疮的危险因素:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population.儿科人群中压疮的患病率。
J Tissue Viability. 2016 May;25(2):127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
10
A two-arm cluster randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention bundle for critically ill patients.一项双臂整群随机对照试验,以确定危重症患者压力性损伤预防集束化方案的有效性。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 May;47(3):237-47. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12136. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

用于预测儿科重症监护病房压力性溃疡风险的Braden QD量表测试。

Testing of Braden QD Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

作者信息

Puspitasari Jayanti Dwi, Nurhaeni Nani, Waluyanti Fajar Tri

机构信息

Faculty of Nusing, Universitas Indonesia.

Dr. R. Soedjati Soemodiarjo Hospital, Grobogan, Indonesia.

出版信息

Pediatr Rep. 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8694. doi: 10.4081/pr.2020.8694.

DOI:10.4081/pr.2020.8694
PMID:32904968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7463138/
Abstract

Children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for pressure injury due to immobility and the challenge of positioning medical devices. However, a comprehensive instrument to assess pressure injury risk is still finite. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Braden QD Scale. The design used was a Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha (α). Fifty-one pediatric patients below age 18 who had been bedridden for at least 24 hours were engaged through a method. The results showed assessments made by using the Braden QD Scale revealed that 88.2% of patients were at risk for a pressure injury. The validity test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.532 and 0.833. The reliability test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.756 and 0.834. The sensitivity value is 100%, specificity value is 40%. In general, the study finding suggests that the Braden QD Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for predicting pressure injury risk. Nurses may employ this tool to assess pressure injury risk in pediatric patients.

摘要

入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童因活动受限和放置医疗设备的挑战而面临发生压疮的风险。然而,用于评估压疮风险的综合工具仍然有限。本研究旨在测试布拉登QD量表的有效性和可靠性。采用的设计方法是皮尔逊相关系数和克朗巴哈系数(α)。通过一种方法纳入了51名18岁以下且卧床至少24小时的儿科患者。结果显示,使用布拉登QD量表进行的评估表明,88.2%的患者有发生压疮的风险。布拉登QD量表的效度测试结果在0.532至0.833之间。布拉登QD量表的信度测试结果在0.756至0.834之间。敏感度值为100%,特异度值为40%。总体而言,研究结果表明布拉登QD量表是预测压疮风险的有效且可靠的工具。护士可使用该工具评估儿科患者的压疮风险。