Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Oct;50(5):943-948. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
To investigate the content validity of several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).
Seven individual PROM instruments were selected by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Myositis Working Group relating to the following domains: pain, fatigue, physical function and physical activity. Twenty patients from the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center were selected for one-on-one face-to-face or phone interviews for cognitive interviewing of individual PROMs to assess comprehension and content validity. Additionally, patients were asked if they thought muscle symptoms, an area originally identified in qualitative studies, were encapsulated by the other four domains.
The majority of patients (>70%) felt that each of the instruments was clear, easy to read and understand, and could be used for assessment of its domain. Two-thirds (66%) of patients felt that 'muscle symptoms' were captured by the other domains.
We provided evidence to support adequate content validity for several PROMs. Further research is needed to determine whether 'muscle symptoms' warrant a separate domain.
调查几种特发性炎性肌病(IIM)患者报告结局测量(PROM)的内容效度。
由风湿病结局测量(OMERACT)肌炎工作组选择了 7 种个体 PROM 工具,涉及以下领域:疼痛、疲劳、身体功能和身体活动。选择约翰霍普金斯肌炎中心的 20 名患者进行一对一的面对面或电话访谈,对个体 PROM 进行认知访谈,以评估理解和内容效度。此外,还询问患者他们是否认为肌肉症状(最初在定性研究中确定的一个领域)被其他四个领域所包含。
大多数患者(>70%)认为每个仪器都清晰、易于阅读和理解,并且可以用于评估其领域。三分之二(66%)的患者认为“肌肉症状”被其他领域所涵盖。
我们提供了充分的证据支持几种 PROM 的内容效度。需要进一步研究确定“肌肉症状”是否需要单独的领域。