病毒特异性记忆 CD8 T 细胞的抗原再刺激需要数天的裂解蛋白积累,以达到最大的细胞毒性能力。
Antigenic Restimulation of Virus-Specific Memory CD8 T Cells Requires Days of Lytic Protein Accumulation for Maximal Cytotoxic Capacity.
机构信息
HIV-Specific Immunity Section, Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
HIV-Specific Immunity Section, Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
出版信息
J Virol. 2020 Nov 9;94(23). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01595-20.
In various infections or vaccinations of mice or humans, reports of the persistence and the requirements for restimulation of the cytotoxic mediators granzyme B (GrB) and perforin (PRF) in CD8 T cells have yielded disparate results. In this study, we examined the kinetics of PRF and GrB mRNA and protein expression after stimulation and associated changes in cytotoxic capacity in virus-specific memory cells in detail. In patients with controlled HIV or cleared respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or influenza virus infections, all virus-specific CD8 T cells expressed low PRF levels without restimulation. Following stimulation, they displayed similarly delayed kinetics for lytic protein expression, with significant increases occurring by days 1 to 3 before peaking on days 4 to 6. These increases were strongly correlated with, but were not dependent upon, proliferation. Incremental changes in PRF and GrB percent expression and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were highly correlated with increases in HIV-specific cytotoxicity. mRNA levels in HIV-specific CD8 T-cells exhibited delayed kinetics after stimulation as with protein expression, peaking on day 5. In contrast to GrB, PRF mRNA transcripts were little changed over 5 days of stimulation (94-fold versus 2.8-fold, respectively), consistent with posttranscriptional regulation. Changes in expression of some microRNAs, including miR-17, miR-150, and miR-155, suggested that microRNAs might play a significant role in regulation of PRF expression. Therefore, under conditions of extremely low or absent antigen levels, memory virus-specific CD8 T cells require prolonged stimulation over days to achieve maximal lytic protein expression and cytotoxic capacity. Antigen-specific CD8 T cells play a major role in controlling most virus infections, primarily by perforin (PRF)- and granzyme B (GrB)-mediated apoptosis. There is considerable controversy regarding whether PRF is constitutively expressed, rapidly increased similarly to a cytokine, or delayed in its expression with more prolonged stimulation in virus-specific memory CD8 T cells. In this study, the degree of cytotoxic capacity of virus-specific memory CD8 T cells was directly proportional to the content of lytic molecules, which required antigenic stimulation over several days for maximal levels. This appeared to be modulated by increases in GrB transcription and microRNA-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of PRF expression. Clarifying the requirements for maximal cytotoxic capacity is critical to understanding how viral clearance might be mediated by memory cells and what functions should be induced by vaccines and immunotherapies.
在各种小鼠或人类的感染或疫苗接种中,关于细胞毒性介质颗粒酶 B (GrB) 和穿孔素 (PRF) 在 CD8 T 细胞中的持续存在和再刺激的需求的报告产生了不同的结果。在这项研究中,我们详细研究了病毒特异性记忆细胞中刺激后 PRF 和 GrB mRNA 和蛋白表达的动力学以及细胞毒性能力的相关变化。在控制 HIV 或清除呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 或流感病毒感染的患者中,所有病毒特异性 CD8 T 细胞表达低水平的 PRF,无需再刺激。刺激后,它们表现出类似的裂解蛋白表达延迟动力学,在第 1 至 3 天显著增加,然后在第 4 至 6 天达到峰值。这些增加与增殖强烈相关,但不依赖于增殖。PRF 和 GrB 表达的百分比和平均荧光强度 (MFI) 的增量变化与 HIV 特异性细胞毒性的增加高度相关。刺激后,HIV 特异性 CD8 T 细胞的 mRNA 水平表现出与蛋白表达相同的延迟动力学,在第 5 天达到峰值。与 GrB 相反,PRF mRNA 转录本在 5 天的刺激过程中变化不大(分别为 94 倍和 2.8 倍),这与转录后调节一致。一些 microRNA,包括 miR-17、miR-150 和 miR-155 的表达变化表明,microRNA 可能在 PRF 表达的调节中发挥重要作用。因此,在抗原水平极低或不存在的情况下,记忆病毒特异性 CD8 T 细胞需要持续数天的刺激才能达到最大的裂解蛋白表达和细胞毒性能力。抗原特异性 CD8 T 细胞在控制大多数病毒感染方面发挥着重要作用,主要通过穿孔素 (PRF) 和颗粒酶 B (GrB) 介导的细胞凋亡。关于 PRF 是否持续表达、是否与细胞因子一样迅速增加,或者在病毒特异性记忆 CD8 T 细胞中是否随着刺激时间的延长而延迟表达存在相当大的争议。在这项研究中,病毒特异性记忆 CD8 T 细胞的细胞毒性能力与裂解分子的含量直接成正比,这需要抗原刺激数天才能达到最高水平。这似乎是通过 GrB 转录的增加和 microRNA 介导的 PRF 表达的转录后调节来调节的。阐明最大细胞毒性能力的要求对于理解病毒清除如何通过记忆细胞介导以及疫苗和免疫疗法应该诱导哪些功能至关重要。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
Cell Rep. 2017-9-12
PLoS Pathog. 2016-8-3
Curr Opin Virol. 2016-2