Suppr超能文献

成人原发性脊柱骨髓炎的后路器械内固定与不使用椎间融合器的内固定及清创术的围手术期结果无差异:来自德国脊柱学会登记研究(DWG 登记研究)的一项多中心监测研究。

There is no difference in perioperative results between posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in adults: a multicenter surveillance study from the German Spine Registry (DWG Register).

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach am Main, Germany -

Department of Spine Surgery, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Sci. 2022 Jun;66(3):187-192. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04869-0. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary spondylodiscitis is a medically challenging disease that can lead to recurrent back pain, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurologic deficits. The incidence rate of primary non-tuberculosis spondylodiscitis has been estimated from 2.2 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-years, and it has been reported to be increasing because of the aging population. The objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation (PI) with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in the treatment of primary spondylodiscitis by comparing perioperative data, functional outcomes, and overall infection-free survival.

METHODS

Analysis of data from the DWG Registry on patients who have undergone posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis from the thoracolumbar junction to S1 (Th10-S1) at 10 institutions from January 2012 to December 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 420 posterior instrumentations with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in the thoracolumbar junction to S1 were identified in the registry; N.=138 were exclusively percutaneous posterior instrumented (PPI), while N.=102 underwent open posterior instrumentation (OPI) without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement and N.=180 OPI with interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement. Clinical evaluation after surgery did not show a significant difference between groups including improvement of the mobilization and infection-free survival. However, with PPI the duration of operation and blood loss was significantly less than OPI with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement as not indispensable for treatment in primary spondylodiscitis. Therefore, we encourage the use of posterior stabilization alone in the treatment of spondylodiscitis as less invasive procedure reducing costs in instrumentation.

摘要

背景

原发性脊椎骨髓炎是一种具有挑战性的医学疾病,可导致反复腰痛、进行性脊柱后凸畸形和神经功能缺损。原发性非结核病脊椎骨髓炎的发病率估计为每 100,000 人 2.2 至 2.4 例,由于人口老龄化,发病率有所增加。目的是通过比较围手术期数据、功能结果和总体无感染生存来确定后路器械固定(PI)联合和不联合椎间笼、骨附着和清创术治疗原发性脊椎骨髓炎的安全性和疗效。

方法

对 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间 10 家机构的胸腰椎连接至 S1(Th10-S1)的原发性脊椎骨髓炎患者进行后路器械固定(联合或不联合椎间笼、骨附着和清创术)的 DWG 登记处数据进行分析。

结果

该登记处共发现 420 例胸腰椎连接至 S1 的原发性脊椎骨髓炎后路器械固定(联合或不联合椎间笼、骨附着和清创术);N.=138 例为单纯经皮后路器械固定(PPI),N.=102 例为后路切开无椎间笼、骨附着和清创术(OPI),N.=180 例为后路切开联合椎间笼、骨附着和清创术(OPI)。术后临床评估显示,各组之间在运动改善和无感染生存方面无显著差异。然而,与 OPI 相比,PPI 的手术时间和失血量明显减少,无论是否联合使用椎间笼、骨附着和清创术。

结论

结果表明,在原发性脊椎骨髓炎的治疗中,椎间笼、骨附着和清创术并非不可或缺。因此,我们鼓励在脊椎骨髓炎的治疗中单独使用后路稳定术,作为一种减少器械成本的微创术式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验