de Montalvo Jääskeläinen Federico
UPComillas, ICADE. Presidente del Comité de Bioética de España.
Cuad Bioet. 2020 May-Aug;31(102):151-165. doi: 10.30444/CB.59.
The public health crisis caused by COVID-19 disease has bring again to the public arena the old debate of the role in decision-making process of politics and science. In this paper we analyze, in the context of the current pandemics, how politics has left a stellar role for science, either because science has anticipated in its proposals to politics, or because politics has opted for it as a premeditated strategy. The references to the opinion of scientists as a decision-making criterion or, furthermore, their presence as true spokesmen for authority have been so frequent. This means rediscovering science and health as instruments of power, in terms that remind us of what Foucault denounced almost fifty years ago with his Biopolitics.
由新冠病毒疾病引发的公共卫生危机再次将政治与科学在决策过程中的作用这一古老辩论带入了公共领域。在本文中,我们分析了在当前大流行的背景下,政治如何为科学留出了显著的空间,这要么是因为科学在向政治提出的建议中具有前瞻性,要么是因为政治将其作为一种预谋的策略而加以选择。将科学家的意见作为决策标准的提及,或者更进一步,他们作为权威的真正代言人的出现,一直如此频繁。这意味着要重新将科学与健康视为权力的工具,这在某种程度上让我们想起了福柯近五十年前在其生物政治学中所谴责的内容。