Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Ueberlandstrasse 133, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Water Res. 2020 Nov 1;186:116330. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116330. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
Surface water quality management requires foresighted decision making regarding long-term investments. It should consider multiple objectives (e.g. related to different pollutants and costs), integrate multiple sources of pollution (point and diffuse sources), and external conditions that change over time (climate, population and land-use changes). Multi-attribute value theory can support such decisions, especially the development of an assessment method. Integrated surface water quality assessment methods including micropollutants are currently lacking or in development in many countries. Important steps for the development of such an immission oriented and integrated surface water quality assessment method are discussed in this paper and exemplified for organic micropollutants. The proposed assessment method goes beyond simple pass-fail criteria for single substances. It provides a continuous assessment on a scale from zero to one based on five color-coded water quality classes and suggestions for the visualization of assessment results. It takes into account the toxicity of the micropollutants and their mixture to aquatic organisms by comparing measured concentrations to environmental quality standards (EQS). The focus of this paper is on aggregation over multiple substances and time. Advantages and disadvantages of different aggregation methods are discussed as well as their implications for practice. The consequences of different aggregation methods are illustrated with didactical examples and by an application of the proposed water quality assessment method to pesticide monitoring data from Switzerland. Recommendations are provided that account for the purpose of the assessment. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how the proposed method can facilitate dealing with uncertainty and a transparent communication of monitoring results to support water quality management decisions.
地表水质量管理需要对长期投资进行有远见的决策。它应考虑多个目标(例如,与不同污染物和成本相关),整合多种污染源(点源和非点源),并考虑随时间变化的外部条件(气候、人口和土地利用变化)。多属性价值理论可以支持此类决策,尤其是评估方法的制定。包括微污染物在内的综合地表水质量评估方法在许多国家目前还缺乏或正在开发中。本文讨论了开发这种面向排放和综合地表水质量评估方法的重要步骤,并以有机微污染物为例进行了说明。所提出的评估方法超越了对单一物质的简单通过/失败标准。它基于五个颜色编码的水质类别和对评估结果的可视化建议,提供了从零到一的连续评估。它通过将测量浓度与环境质量标准 (EQS) 进行比较,考虑了微污染物及其混合物对水生生物的毒性。本文的重点是多种物质和时间的聚合。讨论了不同聚合方法的优缺点及其对实践的影响。不同聚合方法的后果通过教学示例和对瑞士农药监测数据应用所提出的水质评估方法进行了说明。根据评估的目的提供了建议。此外,本文还说明了所提出的方法如何有助于处理不确定性和透明地沟通监测结果,以支持水质管理决策。