Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Psycholinguistique, Département d'Etudes cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0237702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237702. eCollection 2020.
Language input in childhood and literacy (and/or schooling) have been described as two key experiences impacting phonological processing. In this study, we assess phonological processing via a non-word repetition (NWR) group game, in adults and children living in two villages of an ethnic group where infants are rarely spoken to, and where literacy is variable. We found lower NWR scores than in previous work for both children (N = 17; aged 1-12 years) and adults (N = 13; aged 18-60 years), which is consistent with the hypothesis that there would be long-term effects on phonological processing of experiencing low levels of directed input in infancy. Additionally, we found some evidence that literacy and/or schooling increases NWR scores, although results should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size. These findings invite further investigations in similar communities, as current results are most compatible with phonological processing being influenced by aspects of language experience that vary greatly between and within populations.
儿童时期的语言输入和读写能力(和/或学校教育)被描述为影响语音处理的两个关键经验。在这项研究中,我们通过非词重复(NWR)组游戏评估成年人和儿童的语音处理能力,这些成年人和儿童居住在一个少数民族的两个村庄中,在这些村庄中,婴儿很少被与他们说话,而且读写能力也各不相同。我们发现,无论是儿童(N = 17;年龄 1-12 岁)还是成年人(N = 13;年龄 18-60 岁),他们的 NWR 得分都低于之前的研究结果,这与婴儿时期经历低水平定向输入会对语音处理产生长期影响的假设是一致的。此外,我们发现一些证据表明读写能力和/或学校教育会提高 NWR 得分,但鉴于样本量较小,结果应谨慎解释。这些发现邀请在类似社区进行进一步的研究,因为目前的结果最符合语音处理受到语言经验方面的影响,而这些方面在不同人群之间和人群内部存在很大差异。