Department of Neurology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Seizure. 2020 Oct;81:263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a medical emergency associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although guidelines for CSE management recommend rapid treatment of seizures, prior studies show that compliance with these guidelines is low. In this study, we assessed if implementation of a paper-based clinical pathway for the treatment of CSE improves the timeliness and appropriate dosing of first and second line anti-seizure medications (ASM).
A non-digital CSE treatment protocol was implemented as part of a quality improvement initiative in 2016. A retrospective analysis was subsequently conducted on cases of CSE originating in the pediatric emergency department (ED) from 2012-2019. Standard descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographics as well as the timing and dosing of the first and second line ASMs used in our protocol (lorazepam [LZP] and fosphenytoin [FOS]). Statistical process control charts (XmR charts) were used to assess the variation in time to drug administration before and after implementation of the protocol.
153 cases of CSE were identified (72 prior to and 81 after protocol implementation). Among patients who were actively having seizures on arrival to the ED (n = 44), the median time from arrival to ASM administration decreased from 15 to 11 minutes for the first LZP dose (p = 0.23), 23 to 10 minutes for the second LZP dose (p = 0.06), and 40 to 25 minutes for the PHE dose (p = 0.04). There was no improvement in time to LZP administration after seizure onset among those with seizure onset after hospital arrival (5 minutes before/after implementation for the first LZP dose and 15 to 14 minutes for second LZP dose); however, the time to FOS decreased from 42 to 22 minutes (p = 0.86). Statistical process control charts showed a universal decrease in variation for time to each drug administration after protocol implementation. Whereas FOS dosing was largely appropriate before and after protocol implementation, appropriate dosing of LZP did not improve, with only about half of patients receiving the recommended dose.
The implementation of a paper-based treatment protocol for CSE was associated with a decreased time to ASM administration among patients who arrived to the ED, particularly for the second-line ASM. Approaches for improving appropriate benzodiazepine dosing are needed.
癫痫持续状态(CSE)是一种与高发病率和死亡率相关的医疗急症。尽管 CSE 管理指南建议迅速治疗癫痫发作,但先前的研究表明,这些指南的遵守率很低。在这项研究中,我们评估了实施纸质临床路径治疗 CSE 是否可以提高一线和二线抗癫痫药物(ASM)的及时性和适当剂量。
作为 2016 年质量改进倡议的一部分,实施了非数字化 CSE 治疗方案。随后对 2012-2019 年源自儿科急诊部(ED)的 CSE 病例进行了回顾性分析。使用标准描述性统计数据评估患者人口统计学特征,以及我们方案中使用的一线和二线 ASM 的用药时间和剂量(劳拉西泮[LZP]和磷苯妥英[FOS])。统计过程控制图(XmR 图)用于评估在实施方案前后药物给药时间的变化。
共确定了 153 例 CSE(72 例在方案实施前,81 例在方案实施后)。在到达 ED 时正在发作的患者中(n=44),从到达后开始给予 ASM 的时间,对于第一剂 LZP,中位数从 15 分钟减少到 11 分钟(p=0.23),第二剂 LZP 从 23 分钟减少到 10 分钟(p=0.06),苯妥英从 40 分钟减少到 25 分钟(p=0.04)。对于在到达医院后发作的患者,在发作后开始给予 LZP 的时间没有改善(第一剂 LZP 的时间为实施前/后 5 分钟,第二剂 LZP 的时间为 15 分钟至 14 分钟);然而,FOS 的时间从 42 分钟减少到 22 分钟(p=0.86)。统计过程控制图显示,在实施方案后,每种药物给药时间的变化普遍减少。虽然 FOS 的给药量在实施前后基本合适,但 LZP 的给药量并没有改善,只有大约一半的患者接受了推荐剂量。
实施纸质 CSE 治疗方案与到达 ED 的患者 ASM 给药时间缩短有关,特别是对于二线 ASM。需要采取措施改善适当的苯二氮䓬类药物的剂量。