Department of Occupational Diseases and Environmental Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.
Department of Chest Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):937-944.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.056. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Occupational eosinophilic bronchitis (OEB) has been described only as anecdotal case reports.
We investigated the clinical and inflammatory characteristics of subjects with OEB identified in a cohort of subjects who completed a specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with occupational agents.
In this retrospective multicenter study, OEB was defined by (1) a fall in FEV less than 15% during the SIC and the absence of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness both before and after the SIC and (2) a postchallenge increase of 3% or more in sputum eosinophils. The subjects who fulfilled these criteria were compared with 226 subjects with a negative SIC and 30 subjects with a positive SIC who failed to show baseline nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
An isolated increase in postchallenge sputum eosinophils was documented in 33 of 259 subjects (13%) with a negative SIC. These subjects reported significantly more often an isolated cough at work compared with the negative and positive SIC controls. When compared with positive SIC controls, the subjects with OEB experienced less frequently work-related wheezing and reported a shorter duration of symptoms at work. The sensitivity of the post-SIC increase in fractional exhaled nitric oxide in identifying OEB among subjects with a negative SIC was low, ranging from 43% to 24% using cutoff values of 8 ppb to 17.5 ppb, whereas the specificity was high (90%-97%).
This study highlights the relevance of induced sputum analysis in the investigation of work-related asthma symptoms to identify isolated increases in sputum eosinophils that are consistent with a diagnosis of OEB.
职业性嗜酸性粒细胞性支气管炎(OEB)仅被描述为偶发的病例报告。
我们调查了在完成特定吸入性挑战(SIC)的队列中确定的 OEB 患者的临床和炎症特征,这些患者接触的是职业性抗原。
在这项回顾性多中心研究中,OEB 通过以下两种标准定义:(1)SIC 期间 FEV 下降小于 15%,且 SIC 前后不存在非特异性支气管高反应性;(2)痰中嗜酸性粒细胞增加 3%或更多。符合这些标准的患者与 226 名 SIC 阴性且 30 名 SIC 阳性但未能显示基线非特异性支气管高反应性的患者进行了比较。
在 259 名 SIC 阴性的患者中,有 33 名(13%)出现了痰嗜酸性粒细胞增加的孤立性增加。与 SIC 阴性和阳性对照相比,这些患者更频繁地报告工作时出现孤立性咳嗽。与阳性 SIC 对照相比,OEB 患者工作相关喘息的发作频率较低,且工作时的症状持续时间较短。SIC 后呼出气一氧化氮分数增加在识别 SIC 阴性患者中的 OEB 的敏感性较低,范围为 43%至 24%,使用 8 ppb 至 17.5 ppb 的截断值,而特异性较高(90%-97%)。
本研究强调了诱导痰分析在调查与工作相关的哮喘症状中的重要性,以识别与 OEB 一致的痰嗜酸性粒细胞增加的孤立性增加。