Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;48(12):3087-3093. doi: 10.1177/0363546520953440. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
Symptom assessment is a critical component of concussion diagnosis and management, with item selection primarily driven by clinical judgment or expert consensus. We recently demonstrated that concussion symptoms assessed by the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) are essentially unidimensional, implying that overall symptom severity may be accurately estimated with relatively few questions. Briefer, evidence-based forms for symptom assessment would provide clinicians flexibility.
To develop and validate an abbreviated assessment of general concussion symptom severity using item response theory analyses.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Broad clinical assessments (SCAT3, Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing, Balance Error Scoring System, and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 Global Severity Index) were completed by 265 injured athletes and 235 matched teammate controls at 24 to 48 hours and 8, 15, and 45 days after concussion. Symptom checklist short forms (3-14 items from the original 22) were selected using item response theory item information curves. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha), correlation with criterion measures assessed concurrently (ie, acute neurocognitive performance, balance, and emotional symptoms), predictive validity (correlations with symptom duration), and differences between concussed and control groups (Cohen ) were examined across forms. Sensitivity and false-positive rates of the forms were estimated and compared using reliable change indices derived from controls.
Across the 3- to 22-item forms, internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach alphas, 0.90-0.94). Clinical correlations were significant (≤ .017) and to similar degrees for all short forms. Group difference confidence intervals overlapped across forms at 24- to 48-hour (Cohen , 1.27-1.51) and 8-day follow-up (Cohen , 0.31-0.44). Sensitivity remained similar across short forms, with a low false-positive rate in controls.
Our findings suggest that even an ultrashort (3-item) inventory provides sufficiently reliable and valid estimates of overall concussion symptom severity 24 to 48 hours after injury. Future revisions of the SCAT could eliminate inefficient items, although replication in larger samples and extension to other postinjury time points are warranted.
症状评估是 concussion 诊断和管理的关键组成部分,项目选择主要由临床判断或专家共识驱动。我们最近证明,使用 Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) 评估的 concussion 症状基本上是单维的,这意味着相对较少的问题可以准确估计整体症状严重程度。更简短、基于证据的症状评估形式将为临床医生提供灵活性。
使用项目反应理论分析开发和验证一种简化的 concussion 总体症状严重程度评估方法。
队列研究(诊断);证据水平,2 级。
在 concussion 后 24 至 48 小时以及 8、15 和 45 天,265 名受伤运动员和 235 名匹配的队友对照接受了广泛的临床评估(SCAT3、即时 concussion 和认知测试、平衡错误评分系统和 Brief Symptom Inventory-18 全球严重程度指数)。使用项目反应理论项目信息曲线从原始 22 项中选择 3-14 项症状检查表短表。内部一致性可靠性(Cronbach 阿尔法)、与同时评估的标准测量值的相关性(即急性神经认知表现、平衡和情绪症状)、预测有效性(与症状持续时间的相关性)以及在形式之间的 concussion 和对照组之间的差异(Cohen )进行了检查。使用来自对照组的可靠变化指数估计和比较了这些形式的敏感性和假阳性率。
在 3-22 项形式中,内部一致性非常好(Cronbach 阿尔法,0.90-0.94)。所有短表的临床相关性均具有统计学意义(≤.017)且程度相似。在 24 至 48 小时(Cohen ,1.27-1.51)和 8 天随访(Cohen ,0.31-0.44)时,形式之间的组差异置信区间重叠。在短表中,敏感性保持相似,对照组的假阳性率较低。
我们的研究结果表明,即使是非常简短的(3 项)清单,在 injury 后 24 至 48 小时内也能提供足够可靠和有效的 concussion 总体症状严重程度估计。SCAT 的未来修订版可以消除低效项目,但需要在更大的样本中进行复制,并扩展到其他 injury 后时间点。