Bergren Adam Johan, DiLabio Gino A, Van Dyck Colin, Mukundan Vineetha, Fereiro Jerry A
Nanotechnology Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, 11427 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M9, Canada.
Department of Chemistry, The University of British Columbia, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7, Canada.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2020 Sep 30;22(37):21547-21549. doi: 10.1039/d0cp03700a.
Our paper [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 16762] is the subject of a comment that clarifies a flaw in analysis of STM data. We accept the comment in regard to the aspect ratio considerations, but we also further clarify the main conclusions of our paper, and provide a molecular scale schematic using the data presented in the comment to help refine the original conclusions. Taken together, this shows that models presented in the literature may benefit from including more fine structure details, as better understanding may emerge from such considerations. This was the intent of our original article, and we thank the comment authors for the chance to clarify these points.
我们的论文[《物理化学化学物理》，2019年，21卷，16762页]是一篇评论文章的主题，该评论文章澄清了扫描隧道显微镜（STM）数据分析中的一个缺陷。我们接受关于长宽比考虑方面的评论，但我们也进一步阐明了我们论文的主要结论，并利用评论中给出的数据提供了一个分子尺度示意图，以帮助完善原始结论。综上所述，这表明文献中提出的模型可能会受益于纳入更多精细结构细节，因为这样的考虑可能会带来更好的理解。这也是我们原始文章的意图，我们感谢评论作者给予我们澄清这些要点的机会。
