Son Kyung-Bok
College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03760, South Korea.
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Sep 15;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00289-6.
Although the association between the price of generic drugs and market competitiveness has been explored in various high-income countries, this association has not been empirically evaluated in South Korea. We aim to determine the association between the prices of generic drugs and market competitiveness in South Korea.
A list of originator drugs approved by the national authority from 2000 to 2019 and their corresponding generic drugs were grouped along with the baseline information. The market was categorized into four groups based on the number of manufacturers: duopoly (2 manufacturers); low- (3-25 manufacturers); medium- (26-75 manufacturers); and high-competition (more than 76 manufacturers) markets. Price variance, calculated as the difference between the maximum price and minimum price divided by the maximum price, was obtained. A multivariate regression model was applied to regress price variance on the characteristics of market competitiveness, controlling for the characteristics of the originator drugs and their price level in the market.
A total of 986 originator drugs were identified and then divided into duopoly (31%), low- (56%), medium- (9%), and high-competition (4%) markets; the median of the price variance for these markets was 0.013, 0.077, 0.200, and 0.228, respectively. In a multivariate regression model, price variance was associated with the characteristics of the originator drug, including the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification, the route of administration, and the approval year. Controlling for the characteristics of the originator drugs, market competitiveness was positively associated with price variance.
The positive association between price variance and market competitiveness is still consistent in South Korea, where rare price competition among a large number of generic manufacturers has been reported. However, no significant price variance was observed between medium- and high-competition markets. These findings support policies for managing a large number of generic manufacturers in South Korea.
尽管在多个高收入国家已对仿制药价格与市场竞争力之间的关联进行了探讨,但韩国尚未对这种关联进行实证评估。我们旨在确定韩国仿制药价格与市场竞争力之间的关联。
将2000年至2019年国家药品监管机构批准的原研药清单及其相应的仿制药与基线信息进行分组。根据制造商数量将市场分为四组:双头垄断(2家制造商);低竞争(3至25家制造商);中等竞争(26至75家制造商);以及高竞争(超过76家制造商)市场。计算价格方差,即(最高价格与最低价格之差除以最高价格)。应用多元回归模型,在控制原研药特征及其在市场中的价格水平的情况下,对价格方差与市场竞争力特征进行回归分析。
共识别出986种原研药,然后将其分为双头垄断(31%)、低竞争(56%)、中等竞争(9%)和高竞争(4%)市场;这些市场的价格方差中位数分别为0.(此处原文可能有误,推测应为0.013)、0.077、0.200和0.228。在多元回归模型中,价格方差与原研药的特征相关,包括解剖治疗化学分类、给药途径和批准年份。在控制原研药特征的情况下,市场竞争力与价格方差呈正相关。
在韩国,尽管有报道称大量仿制药制造商之间罕见价格竞争,但价格方差与市场竞争力之间的正相关关系仍然存在。然而,在中等竞争和高竞争市场之间未观察到显著的价格方差差异。这些发现支持韩国针对大量仿制药制造商的管理政策。