Suppr超能文献

用于大规模伤寒监测、家庭接触者追踪和卫生服务利用调查的电子数据采集:亚非战略伤寒联盟

Electronic data capture for large scale typhoid surveillance, household contact tracing, and health utilisation survey: Strategic Typhoid Alliance across Africa and Asia.

作者信息

Thindwa Deus, Farooq Yama G, Shakya Mila, Saha Nirod, Tonks Susan, Anokwa Yaw, Gordon Melita A, Hartung Carl, Meiring James E, Pollard Andrew J, Heyderman Robert S

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, London, UK.

Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Dec 1;5:66. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15811.2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Electronic data capture systems (EDCs) have the potential to achieve efficiency and quality in collection of multisite data. We quantify the volume, time, accuracy and costs of an EDC using large-scale census data from the STRATAA consortium, a comprehensive programme assessing population dynamics and epidemiology of typhoid fever in Malawi, Nepal and Bangladesh to inform vaccine and public health interventions. A census form was developed through a structured iterative process and implemented using Open Data Kit Collect running on Android-based tablets. Data were uploaded to Open Data Kit Aggregate, then auto-synced to MySQL-defined database nightly. Data were backed-up daily from three sites centrally, and auto-reported weekly. Pre-census materials' costs were estimated. Demographics of 308,348 individuals from 80,851 households were recorded within an average of 14.7 weeks range (13-16) using 65 fieldworkers. Overall, 21.7 errors (95% confidence interval: 21.4, 22.0) per 10,000 data points were found: 13.0 (95% confidence interval: 12.6, 13.5) and 24.5 (95% confidence interval: 24.1, 24.9) errors on numeric and text fields respectively. These values meet standard quality threshold of 50 errors per 10,000 data points. The EDC's total variable cost was estimated at US$13,791.82 per site. In conclusion, the EDC is robust, allowing for timely and high-volume accurate data collection, and could be adopted in similar epidemiological settings.

摘要

电子数据采集系统(EDC)有潜力在多地点数据收集方面实现效率和质量提升。我们利用STRATAA联盟的大规模普查数据,对一个EDC的数量、时间、准确性和成本进行了量化。STRATAA联盟是一个全面的项目,旨在评估马拉维、尼泊尔和孟加拉国伤寒热的人口动态和流行病学情况,以为疫苗和公共卫生干预提供信息。通过一个结构化的迭代过程开发了一份普查表格,并使用在基于安卓的平板电脑上运行的开放数据工具包采集器(Open Data Kit Collect)来实施。数据被上传到开放数据工具包汇总器(Open Data Kit Aggregate),然后每晚自动同步到由MySQL定义的数据库。数据每天从三个站点集中备份,并每周自动报告一次。估算了普查前材料的成本。使用65名实地工作人员,在平均14.7周(13 - 16周)的时间范围内记录了来自80,851户家庭的308,348人的人口统计数据。总体而言,每10,000个数据点发现21.7个错误(95%置信区间:21.4, 22.0):数字字段和文本字段的错误分别为13.0(95%置信区间:12.6, 13.5)和24.5(95%置信区间:24.1, 24.9)。这些值符合每10,000个数据点50个错误的标准质量阈值。EDC的总可变成本估计为每个站点13,791.82美元。总之,该EDC功能强大,能够及时、大量地准确收集数据,可在类似的流行病学环境中采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7713888/c70354ac8bed/wellcomeopenres-5-18126-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验