Prochazkova Marie, Tintera Jaroslav, Spanhelova Sarka, Prokopiusova Terezie, Rydlo Jan, Pavlikova Marketa, Prochazka Antonin, Rasova Kamila
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):356-365. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06336-4. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches.
The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS.
The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls.
Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study.
The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls).
PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination.
Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01).
Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation.
The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.
成像方法为描述脑可塑性过程带来了新的可能性,这些过程是多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者物理治疗后临床功能改善的基础。尽管这些过程主要是在与任务导向性物理治疗和有氧训练相关的研究中被描述的,但在神经本体感觉“易化、抑制”(易化)方法中尚未得到充分验证。
本研究确定易化物理治疗是否能增强脑可塑性,比较两种易化方法,并寻找其与pwMS患者临床改善之间的关系。
本研究设计为针对健康对照的两种物理治疗干预措施的平行组随机对照试验。
38名门诊患者参与了本研究。
本研究共有80名参与者(38名pwMS患者和42名健康对照)。
pwMS患者被分为两组,接受为期两个月的物理治疗方案:vojta反射运动疗法(VRL)或运动程序激活疗法(MPAT)(每周两次,每次1小时)。在治疗前后进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和临床检查。健康对照进行一次fMRI检查。
pwMS患者的物理治疗导致特定脑区(小脑、辅助运动区和运动前区)的脑活动扩展,这与治疗后个体患者临床状况的改善相关(P = 0.05)。MPAT治疗后的变化比VRL治疗后的变化更大(P = 0.001)。激活的扩展是向健康对照的激活状态转变,健康对照在小脑和二级视觉区的激活更高(P = 0.01)。
神经本体感觉“易化、抑制”物理治疗可能增强脑活动,并可能涉及与运动激活处理相关的过程。
该研究表明易化方法可以调节脑活动。这可能有助于开发针对MS的有效物理治疗方法。