曲妥珠单抗联合或不联合化疗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性老年早期乳腺癌的随机对照试验。
Randomized Controlled Trial of Trastuzumab With or Without Chemotherapy for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Older Patients.
机构信息
Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
出版信息
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3743-3752. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00184. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
PURPOSE
Adjuvant trastuzumab monotherapy has not been compared with trastuzumab + chemotherapy. We investigated the relative value of trastuzumab monotherapy for older patients with breast cancer.
METHODS
This study was an open-label, randomized controlled study with a treatment selection design in which a noninferiority criterion was predefined. Patients aged 70-80 years with surgically treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive invasive breast cancer received trastuzumab monotherapy or trastuzumab + chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) with assessment of prespecified hazard ratio (HR), relapse-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and restricted mean survival time (RMST).
RESULTS
The study involved 275 patients (mean age, 73.5 years) who were followed up for a mean of 4.1 years (range, 0.3-8.0 years). The percentages of patients by cancer stage were as follows: I (pT > 0.5 cm), 43.6%; IIA, 41.7%; IIB, 13.5%; and IIIA, 1.1%. Three-year DFS was 89.5% with trastuzumab monotherapy versus 93.8% with trastuzumab + chemotherapy (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.58; = .51). At 3 years, RMST differed by -0.39 months between arms (95% CI, -1.71 to 0.93; = .56). Three-year RFS was 92.4% with trastuzumab monotherapy versus 95.3% with trastuzumab + chemotherapy (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.63 to 2.79; = .53). Common AEs were anorexia (7.4% 44.3%; < .0001) and alopecia (2.2% 71.7%; < .0001), and grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs occurred in 11.9% versus 29.8% ( = .0003) for trastuzumab monotherapy versus trastuzumab + chemotherapy, respectively. Clinically meaningful HRQoL deterioration rate showed significant differences at 2 months (31% for trastuzumab monotherapy 48% for trastuzumab + chemotherapy; = .016) and at 1 year (19% 38%; = .009).
CONCLUSION
The primary objective of noninferiority for trastuzumab monotherapy was not met. However, the observed loss of survival without chemotherapy was < 1 month at 3 years. Therefore, and in light of the lower toxicity and more favorable HRQoL profile, trastuzumab monotherapy can be considered an adjuvant therapy option for selected older patients.
目的
曲妥珠单抗辅助单药治疗尚未与曲妥珠单抗联合化疗进行比较。我们研究了曲妥珠单抗单药治疗老年乳腺癌患者的相对价值。
方法
这是一项开放标签、随机对照研究,采用治疗选择设计,预设了非劣效性标准。接受手术治疗的人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性浸润性乳腺癌且年龄为 70-80 岁的患者接受曲妥珠单抗单药治疗或曲妥珠单抗联合化疗。主要终点是无病生存(DFS),评估预设的危险比(HR)、无复发生存(RFS)、不良事件(AEs)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和受限平均生存时间(RMST)。
结果
该研究纳入了 275 例(平均年龄 73.5 岁)患者,平均随访时间为 4.1 年(范围为 0.3-8.0 年)。各期癌症患者比例如下:I 期(pT > 0.5 cm)占 43.6%;IIA 期占 41.7%;IIB 期占 13.5%;IIIA 期占 1.1%。曲妥珠单抗单药治疗组 3 年 DFS 为 89.5%,曲妥珠单抗联合化疗组为 93.8%(HR,1.36;95%CI,0.72 至 2.58; =.51)。3 年时,RMST 臂间差异为-0.39 个月(95%CI,-1.71 至 0.93; =.56)。曲妥珠单抗单药治疗组 3 年 RFS 为 92.4%,曲妥珠单抗联合化疗组为 95.3%(HR,1.33;95%CI,0.63 至 2.79; =.53)。常见的 AEs 是厌食症(7.4% 44.3%;<.0001)和脱发(2.2% 71.7%;<.0001),曲妥珠单抗单药治疗组和曲妥珠单抗联合化疗组分别有 11.9%和 29.8%发生 3/4 级非血液学 AEs( =.0003)。2 个月时(曲妥珠单抗单药治疗组为 31%,曲妥珠单抗联合化疗组为 48%; =.016)和 1 年时(曲妥珠单抗单药治疗组为 19%,曲妥珠单抗联合化疗组为 38%; =.009),HRQoL 恶化率出现有统计学意义的差异。
结论
曲妥珠单抗单药治疗的非劣效性主要目标未达到。然而,3 年时无化疗生存损失< 1 个月。因此,鉴于较低的毒性和更有利的 HRQoL 特征,曲妥珠单抗单药治疗可被视为某些老年患者的辅助治疗选择。