Institute of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0235595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235595. eCollection 2020.
The question of whether infants prefer prosocial agents over antisocial agents is contentious. Therefore, the first goal of the present study was to replicate previous findings regarding infants' preference. The second goal was to assess whether infants are more likely to imitate a prosocial agent than an antisocial agent. We tested 9-month-old, 14-month-old, and 4-year-old children. The study used the "opening a box to get a toy" paradigm in which an animal puppet is trying unsuccessfully to open a box and is either helped by a prosocial puppet or hindered by an antisocial puppet. We presented these social events via video, and subsequently administered an imitation task. As an additional control, adults were asked to describe the videos showing the prosocial and antisocial agent. Although most adults were able to identify both agents, the three age groups of children did not prefer the prosocial agent over the antisocial agent, and were not more likely to imitate the prosocial agent. The lack of differences might be explained by methodological issues or by a lack of robustness of the effect.
婴儿是否更喜欢亲社会行为者而不是反社会行为者,这一问题存在争议。因此,本研究的第一个目标是复制先前关于婴儿偏好的发现。第二个目标是评估婴儿是否更有可能模仿亲社会行为者而不是反社会行为者。我们测试了 9 个月、14 个月和 4 岁的儿童。该研究使用了“打开盒子取玩具”范式,其中一个动物木偶试图打开一个盒子但未成功,然后由一个亲社会木偶或反社会木偶帮助。我们通过视频呈现这些社会事件,然后进行模仿任务。作为额外的控制,要求成年人描述显示亲社会和反社会行为者的视频。尽管大多数成年人能够识别这两个行为者,但三个年龄组的儿童都没有表现出对亲社会行为者的偏好超过反社会行为者,也没有更倾向于模仿亲社会行为者。缺乏差异可能是由于方法学问题或缺乏效应的稳健性所解释。