Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;42(3):318-324. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.424. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Antibiotic allergy labels are common and are frequently inaccurate. Previous studies among adults demonstrate that β-lactam allergy labels may lead to adverse outcomes, including prescription of broader-spectrum antibiotics, increased costs, and increased lengths of stay, among others. However, data among pediatric patients are lacking, especially in the United States. In this study, we sought to determine the impact of β-lactam allergy labels in hospitalized children with regards to clinical and economic outcomes.
This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients 30 days to 17 years old, hospitalized at Intermountain Healthcare facilities from 2007 to 2017, who received ≥1 dose of an antibiotic during their admission. Patients with β-lactam allergies were matched to nonallergic patients based on age, sex, clinical service line, admission date, academic children's hospital or other hospital admission, and the presence of chronic, comorbid conditions. Outcomes included receipt of broader-spectrum antibiotics, clinical outcomes including length of stay and readmission, and antibiotic and hospitalization costs.
In total, 38,906 patients were identified. The prevalence of antibiotic allergy increased from 0.9% among those < 1 year peaked at 10.6% by age 17. Patients with β-lactam allergy received broader-spectrum antibiotics and experienced higher antibiotic costs than nonallergic controls. However, there were no differences in the length of stay, readmission rates, or total number of days of antibiotics between allergic and nonallergic patients.
Hospitalized pediatric patients with β-lactam allergy labels receive broader-spectrum antibiotics and experience increased antibiotic costs. This represents an important opportunity for allergy delabeling and antibiotic stewardship.
抗生素过敏标签很常见,但通常不准确。先前的成人研究表明,β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签可能导致不良后果,包括处方更广泛谱的抗生素、增加成本和延长住院时间等。然而,儿科患者的数据缺乏,尤其是在美国。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签对住院儿童的临床和经济结果的影响。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2007 年至 2017 年期间在 Intermountain Healthcare 医疗机构住院的 30 天至 17 岁的儿科患者,他们在住院期间至少接受了一剂抗生素。β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏患者根据年龄、性别、临床服务线、入院日期、是否为学术儿童医院或其他医院入院、是否存在慢性合并症等因素与非过敏患者进行匹配。结果包括接受更广泛谱的抗生素、临床结果包括住院时间和再入院率、抗生素和住院费用。
共有 38906 名患者被确定。抗生素过敏的患病率从<1 岁的 0.9%增加到 17 岁时的 10.6%。β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏患者接受了更广泛谱的抗生素,抗生素费用高于非过敏对照组。然而,过敏和非过敏患者的住院时间、再入院率或抗生素使用天数无差异。
有β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签的住院儿科患者接受了更广泛谱的抗生素,抗生素费用增加。这代表了过敏标签去除和抗生素管理的重要机会。