Cooney W P
Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hand Clin. 1988 May;4(2):155-65.
A large number of tendon transfers have been described that restore opposition to the thumb and provide thumb and finger flexion. To provide optimal results following tendon transfers, one needs to follow the principles of tendon transfer: normal tissue equilibrium, movable joints, and a scar-free bed. Once these are present, we must look to available tables to determine an appropriate tendon transfer, matching up the lost muscle mass, fiber length, and cross-sectional area and then pick out muscle-tendon units of similar size, strength, and potential excursion. For low median nerve palsy (Table 4), we have found from our experimental and clinical studies that the FDS of the long and ring fingers or the wrist extensors (ECR or ECRL) best approximate the force and motion required for full thumb opposition and strength. These transfers are preferred in median nerve palsy or combined median ulnar nerve palsy when both strength and motion are required. In circumstances where only thumb mobility is desired, the EIP is an ideal transfer. Also, the extensor digitorum quinti (EDQ) and ADQ have sufficient mean fiber length (muscle excursion) to provide full thumb opposition. The palmaris longus transfer (Camitz transfer) is an abduction rather than an opposition transfer and should be reserved for selected cases of long-term carpal tunnel syndrome. For high median nerve palsy (Table 5), transfers of the brachioradialis or ECRL to restore lost thumb flexion (FPL) and side-to-side transfer of the FDP of the index finger are generally sufficient. A separate transfer to restore independent flexion of the index finger could be performed by utilizing the pronator teres or extensor carpi radialis ulnaris tendon muscle units. As they combine a proper direction of action, pulley location, and tendon insertion, tendon transfers for median nerve palsy are usually quite successful. In considering any of these elective procedures, however, it is important to remember that tendon transfers are muscle balance operations. The effect of transfer on restoring function must be carefully studied to assess the loss of function that such a transfer may endure.
已经描述了大量的肌腱转移术,这些手术可恢复拇指对掌功能并实现拇指和手指的屈曲。为了在肌腱转移术后获得最佳效果,必须遵循肌腱转移的原则:正常的组织平衡、可活动的关节以及无瘢痕的床面。一旦具备这些条件,我们就必须参考现有的表格来确定合适的肌腱转移术,匹配丢失的肌肉量、纤维长度和横截面积,然后挑选出大小、强度和潜在行程相似的肌腱单位。对于低位正中神经麻痹(表4),我们从实验和临床研究中发现,示指和环指的指浅屈肌或腕伸肌(桡侧腕短伸肌或桡侧腕长伸肌)最接近实现完全拇指对掌和力量所需的力和运动。当需要力量和运动时,这些转移术在正中神经麻痹或正中尺神经联合麻痹中是首选。在仅需要拇指活动度的情况下,示指固有伸肌是理想的转移选择。此外,小指伸肌和小指展肌有足够的平均纤维长度(肌肉行程)来实现完全的拇指对掌。掌长肌转移术(卡米茨转移术)是一种外展而非对掌转移术,应保留用于特定的长期腕管综合征病例。对于高位正中神经麻痹(表5),通常将肱桡肌或桡侧腕长伸肌转移以恢复丢失的拇指屈曲(拇长屈肌),并将示指指深屈肌进行侧方转移就足够了。可以利用旋前圆肌或尺侧腕伸肌腱肌单位进行单独转移以恢复示指的独立屈曲。由于它们结合了适当的作用方向、滑车位置和肌腱附着点,正中神经麻痹的肌腱转移术通常相当成功。然而,在考虑任何这些选择性手术时,重要的是要记住肌腱转移术是肌肉平衡手术。必须仔细研究转移对恢复功能的影响,以评估这种转移可能承受的功能丧失。