Reply to Arora et al.: Concerns and considerations about using the CV as an equity tool.
作者信息
Malisch Jessica L, Harris Breanna N, Sherrer Shanen M, Lewis Kristy A, Shepherd Stephanie L, McCarthy Pumtiwitt C, Spott Jessica L, Karam Elizabeth P, Moustaid-Moussa Naima, Calarco Jessica McCrory, Ramalingam Latha, Talley Amelia E, Cañas-Carrell Jaclyn E, Ardon-Dryer Karin, Weiser Dana A, Bernal Ximena E, Deitloff Jennifer
机构信息
Department of Biology, St. Mary's College of Maryland, St. Mary's City, MD 20686;
Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24033-24034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015932117. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Arora et al.: Concerns and considerations about using the CV as an equity tool.对阿罗拉等人的回复：关于将简历作为公平工具的担忧与思考。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24033-24034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015932117. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
Reply to Chase and to Milner .回复蔡斯和米尔纳。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov 1;202(9):1319-1320. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2959LE.
3
Reply to Lipworth : Inhaled Corticosteroids and COVID-19.对利普沃思的回复：吸入性糖皮质激素与2019冠状病毒病
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 15;202(6):900-902. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2129LE.
4
In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Neurological Impact of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Practical Considerations for the Neuroscience Community".致编辑的信的回复，主题为“冠状病毒病（COVID-19）的神经学影响：神经科学界的实际考量” 。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:535-536. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.115. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Reply by Pan to Haouzi .潘对豪齐的回复。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):630-631. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-2045LE.
6
Reply by Xu to Haouzi .徐对豪子的回复。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):631-632. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1841LE.
7
Reply to: "Concerns Raised by Publication of Antonini et al., 'Outcome of Parkinson Disease Patients Affected by Covid-19'".回复：“安东尼尼等人发表的《帕金森病患者感染新冠病毒后的结局》引发的关注”
Mov Disord. 2020 Aug;35(8):1298. doi: 10.1002/mds.28183.
8
Evidence for (mis-)understanding or obfuscation in the COVID-19 and digit ratio relationship? A reply to Jones et al.关于新冠疫情与食指长度比关系中（错误）理解或混淆的证据？对琼斯等人的回应
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Sep;148:105100. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105100. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Reply to Dutheil et al.对迪泰尔等人的回复
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Jul 1;129(1):2. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00437.2020.
10
Reply to "Indications and timing for tracheostomy in patients with SARS CoV2-related" by Ferri et al.对费里等人所著《2019冠状病毒病相关患者气管切开术的适应证及时机》的回复
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2405-2406. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06134-0. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
本文引用的文献
1
Using the curriculum vitae to promote gender equity during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间利用简历促进性别平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012969117. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours.新冠疫情与工作时长的性别差距
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jan;28(Suppl 1):101-112. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12506. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
4
In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists-Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening.在某些职业中，女性已经有了相当的占比，但性别偏见依然存在——那些认为不存在性别偏见的人使其延续下去。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 26;6(26):eaba7814. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7814. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity.观点：在新冠疫情之后，学术界需要新的解决方案来确保性别平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15378-15381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010636117. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Zotero 插件