Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control and Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences), Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
J Urban Health. 2020 Dec;97(6):759-775. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00476-0.
Reduced access to school meals during public health emergencies can accelerate food insecurity and nutritional status, particularly for low-income children in urban areas. To prevent the exacerbation of health disparities, there is a need to understand the implementation of meal distribution among large urban school districts during emergencies and to what degree these strategies provide equitable meal access. Our case study of four large urban school districts during the COVID-19 pandemic aims to address these knowledge gaps. Guided by the Getting to Equity (GTE) framework, we conducted a mixed-methods study evaluating emergency meal distribution and strategy implementation in four large urban school districts (Chicago Public Schools, Houston Independent School District, Los Angeles Unified School District, and New York City Department of Education). We gathered data from school district websites on (1) meal service and delivery sites and (2) district documents, policies, communication, and resources. Using qualitative coding approaches, we identified unique and shared district strategies to address meal distribution and communications during the pandemic according to the four components of the GTE framework: increase healthy options, reduce deterrents, build on community capacity, and increase social and economic resources. We matched district census tract boundaries to demographic data from the 2018 American Community Survey and United States Department of Agriculture food desert data, and used geographic information systems (GIS) software to identify meal site locations relative to student population, areas of high poverty and high minority populations, and food deserts. We found that all districts developed strategies to optimize meal provision, which varied across case site. Strategies to increase healthy options included serving adults and other members of the general public, providing timely information on meal site locations, and promoting consumption of a balanced diet. The quantity and frequency of meals served varied, and the degree to which districts promoted high-quality nutrition was limited. Reducing deterrents related to using inclusive language and images and providing safety information on social distancing practices in multiple languages. Districts built community capacity through partnering with first responder, relief, and other community organizations. Increased social and economic resources were illustrated by providing technology assistance to families, childcare referrals for essential workers, and other wellness resources. Geospatial analysis suggests that service locations across cities varied to some degree by demographics and food environment, with potential gaps in reach. This study identifies strategies that have the potential to increase equitable access to nutrition assistance programs. Our findings can support (1) ongoing efforts to address child food insecurity during the pandemic and (2) future meal provision through programs like the Summer Food Service Program and Seamless Summer Option. Future research should further examine the rationale behind meal site placement and how site availability changed over time.
在公共卫生紧急情况下,学校供餐机会减少会加速粮食不安全和营养状况恶化,尤其是对城市地区的低收入儿童而言。为了防止健康差距加剧,有必要了解在紧急情况下大型城市学区的膳食分配情况,以及这些策略在多大程度上提供公平的膳食机会。我们对四个大城市学区在 COVID-19 大流行期间的案例研究旨在解决这些知识空白。本研究以“实现公平”(GTE)框架为指导,采用混合方法研究评估了四个大城市学区(芝加哥公立学校、休斯顿独立学区、洛杉矶联合学区和纽约市教育局)的紧急膳食分配和策略实施情况。我们从学区网站收集了以下数据:(1)用餐服务和提供地点,(2)学区文件、政策、沟通和资源。我们使用定性编码方法,根据 GTE 框架的四个组成部分(增加健康选择、减少障碍、利用社区能力和增加社会经济资源),确定了针对大流行期间膳食分配和沟通的独特和共享的学区策略。我们将学区普查区边界与 2018 年美国社区调查和美国农业部食物荒漠数据中的人口统计数据进行匹配,并使用地理信息系统(GIS)软件确定了用餐地点相对于学生人数、高贫困和少数民族人口地区以及食物荒漠的位置。我们发现,所有学区都制定了优化膳食供应的策略,这些策略因案例地点而异。增加健康选择的策略包括为成年人和其他公众提供服务、及时提供有关用餐地点的信息,并促进均衡饮食的消费。所提供的膳食数量和频率各不相同,而各学区在推广高质量营养方面的程度有限。减少障碍的策略包括使用包容性语言和图像,并提供关于社会距离实践的多语言安全信息。学区通过与第一响应者、救济和其他社区组织合作来建立社区能力。增加社会和经济资源的措施包括为家庭提供技术援助、为必要工作人员提供儿童保育推荐以及提供其他健康资源。地理空间分析表明,各城市的服务地点在一定程度上因人口统计数据和食物环境而异,存在覆盖范围的潜在差距。本研究确定了增加营养援助计划公平获取机会的策略。我们的研究结果可以支持(1)在大流行期间解决儿童粮食不安全问题的持续努力,以及(2)通过暑期食品服务计划和无缝暑期选择等计划进行未来膳食供应。未来的研究应进一步研究膳食地点选择背后的原理以及随着时间的推移地点可用性的变化。