Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Target Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(5):623-633. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00750-w.
Predictive markers for the clinical outcomes of second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain unclear.
This retrospective biomarker study was conducted to explore predictive markers for patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC who were treated with FOLFIRI plus panitumumab (Pani) or bevacizumab (Bev) in the WJOG6210G trial.
The associations of early tumor shrinkage (ETS), tumor location, and VEGF-D with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the association of depth of response (DpR) with PFS and OS. Serum VEGF-D levels were measured in samples collected before treatment using magnetic bead panel Milliplex xMAP kits.
In total, 101 patients (Pani, n = 49; Bev, n = 52) were enrolled in this study. Patients with ETS had longer PFS (Pani: hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, P = 0.009; Bev: HR 0.078, P = 0.0002) and OS (Pani: HR 0.49, P = 0.044; Bev: HR 0.35, P = 0.048) than patients without ETS. The DpR was moderately correlated with PFS and OS in Pani (rs = 0.75, P < 0.001; rs = 0.60, P < 0.001) and Bev groups (rs = 0.68, P < 0.001; rs = 0.44, P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in PFS and OS between the two treatment groups even if in left-sided tumors. No significant interaction between VEGF-D levels and treatment was observed in PFS and OS.
ETS and DpR serve as surrogate markers of PFS and OS in the second-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus targeted agent for mCRC.
预测转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)二线治疗临床结局的标志物仍不明确。
本回顾性生物标志物研究旨在探索 KRAS 外显子 2 野生型 mCRC 患者接受 FOLFIRI 联合帕尼单抗(Pani)或贝伐珠单抗(Bev)治疗的 WJOG6210G 试验中,预测标志物。
采用 Cox 比例风险模型分析早期肿瘤退缩(ETS)、肿瘤部位和 VEGF-D 与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关性。采用 Spearman 相关系数分析深度缓解率(DpR)与 PFS 和 OS 的相关性。采用磁珠面板 Milliplex xMAP 试剂盒检测治疗前样本中的血清 VEGF-D 水平。
共纳入 101 例患者(Pani 组,n=49;Bev 组,n=52)。与无 ETS 患者相比,有 ETS 患者的 PFS(Pani:风险比(HR)0.40,P=0.009;Bev:HR 0.078,P=0.0002)和 OS(Pani:HR 0.49,P=0.044;Bev:HR 0.35,P=0.048)更长。DpR 与 Pani(rs=0.75,P<0.001;rs=0.60,P<0.001)和 Bev 组(rs=0.68,P<0.001;rs=0.44,P=0.002)的 PFS 和 OS 中度相关。即使在左侧肿瘤中,两组患者的 PFS 和 OS 也无显著差异。PFS 和 OS 中未观察到 VEGF-D 水平与治疗之间的显著交互作用。
在 mCRC 二线治疗中,ETS 和 DpR 可作为 FOLFIRI 联合靶向药物治疗的 PFS 和 OS 的替代标志物。