Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2020 Sep;223:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Depersonalization and derealization are currently considered diagnostically distinct from first-rank symptoms (FRS) seen in schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses. Nevertheless, the lived experiences of these symptoms can be very similar phenomenologically.
To investigate the interrelationships between depersonalization, derealization and FRS in individuals with different types of psychotic and non-psychotic diagnoses.
The Chicago Follow-up Study was a prospective longitudinal research program designed to study psychopathology and recovery in psychiatric disorders consisting of 555 participants, who were recruited at index hospitalization and studied over six follow-up timepoints at approximately 2, 4.5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 years later. The primary clinical indices were depersonalization, derealization and Schneiderian FRS that were measured at index hospitalization and at each subsequent follow-up.
62.8% of participants had at least four follow-ups. There were significant differences in the course and chronicity of depersonalization, derealization and first-rank symptoms across the three diagnostic groups. For the whole sample, derealization was significantly associated with FRS at 2-, 4.5- and 7.5-year follow-up timepoints whereas depersonalization was related to FRS from 10-year follow-up to 20-year follow-up. In participants with schizophrenia, overall depersonalization was more often associated with passivity phenomena whereas derealization was more often associated with overall delusions. There was also a significant effect of time on the associations between depersonalization, derealization and FRS across follow-ups.
Depersonalization and derealization should be viewed as transdiagnostic phenomena that are associated with FRS psychopathology along a continuum, although they are more closely associated with schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses.
去人格化和现实解体目前被认为与精神分裂症谱系精神病中所见的一级症状(FRS)在诊断上不同。然而,这些症状的体验在现象学上可能非常相似。
研究不同类型精神病和非精神病诊断个体中去人格化、现实解体和 FRS 之间的相互关系。
芝加哥随访研究是一项前瞻性纵向研究计划,旨在研究精神障碍中的精神病理学和康复,包括 555 名参与者,他们在索引住院时招募,并在随后的六个随访时间点进行研究,大约在 2、4.5、7.5、10、15 和 20 年后。主要的临床指标是去人格化、现实解体和 Schneiderian FRS,在索引住院时和随后的每次随访中测量。
62.8%的参与者至少有四次随访。在三个诊断组中,去人格化、现实解体和一级症状的病程和慢性程度存在显著差异。对于整个样本,在 2、4.5 和 7.5 年随访时间点,现实解体与 FRS 显著相关,而去人格化与 10 年随访至 20 年随访的 FRS 相关。在精神分裂症患者中,总体去人格化与被动现象更相关,而现实解体与总体妄想更相关。在整个随访过程中,去人格化、现实解体和 FRS 之间的关联也受到时间的显著影响。
去人格化和现实解体应被视为跨诊断现象,它们与 FRS 精神病理学沿着一个连续体相关,尽管它们与精神分裂症谱系精神病更为密切相关。