Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Department of Quality Management, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Am Surg. 2021 Feb;87(2):321-327. doi: 10.1177/0003134820950292. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
Institutional pathways (IPs) allow efficient utilization of health care resources. Recent literature reports decreased hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, and costs with the admittance of surgical disease to surgical services. Our study aimed to demonstrate that admission to surgery for nonoperative, acute diverticulitis reduces hospital LOS, and cost, with comparable complication rates.
In January 2017, we defined IPs for diverticulitis, mandating emergency department admission to a surgical service. Patients admitted from October 2015 to June 2016 (pre-protocol, control cohort) were compared with those admitted January 2017-September 2018 (post-protocol, IP cohort). Primary outcomes included hospital LOS, direct cost, indirect cost, total cost, and 30-day readmission. Student's 2-tailed -test and chi-square analysis were utilized, with statistical significance < .05.
Nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis occurred in 62 (74%) patients in the control cohort. One hundred and eleven patients (85%) were admitted to the IP cohort. Patient characteristics were similar, except for a higher percentage of surgical patients utilizing private insurance and younger in age. Interestingly, no difference in hospital LOS (3.8 vs 4.7 days; = 0.07), direct cost ($2639.44 vs $3251.52; = .19), or overall cost ($5968.67 vs $6404.08, = .61) was found between cohorts. Thirty-day readmission rates were comparable at 8% and 11% ( = .59).
Institutional policy mandating admissions for patients receiving nonoperative management of diverticulitis to surgical services does not reduce hospital LOS or cost. This argues that admission to medical services may be an acceptable practice. This raises the question, is acute diverticulitis always a surgical issue?
机构途径 (IP) 允许有效地利用医疗资源。最近的文献报告显示,将手术疾病纳入手术服务可以缩短医院住院时间 (LOS)、减少并发症和降低成本。我们的研究旨在证明,对非手术性急性憩室炎患者进行手术治疗可降低住院 LOS 和成本,同时并发症发生率相当。
2017 年 1 月,我们为憩室炎定义了 IP,要求急诊患者转入外科服务。将 2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 6 月(协议前,对照组)收治的患者与 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 9 月(协议后,IP 组)收治的患者进行比较。主要结局包括住院 LOS、直接成本、间接成本、总成本和 30 天再入院率。采用学生双尾 t 检验和卡方分析,以 P 值<.05 为统计学意义。
对照组中 62 例(74%)患者接受非手术治疗急性憩室炎。111 例(85%)患者被收治到 IP 组。患者特征相似,但手术患者中利用私人保险的比例较高,年龄较小。有趣的是,两组间住院 LOS(3.8 天比 4.7 天;P=.07)、直接成本($2639.44 比 $3251.52;P=.19)或总费用($5968.67 比 $6404.08;P=.61)均无差异。30 天再入院率相似,分别为 8%和 11%(P=.59)。
机构政策要求对接受非手术治疗的憩室炎患者进行手术治疗,不会缩短住院 LOS 或降低成本。这表明,收治到内科可能是一种可行的做法。这就提出了一个问题,急性憩室炎是否总是一个手术问题?