Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, Somerset BA2 7AY, United Kingdom; Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, Somerset BA2 7AY, United Kingdom; Centre for Functional Magnetic Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, Somerset BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Jan 15;397:112922. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112922. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
During self-guided movements, we optimise performance by combining sensory and self-motion cues optimally, based on their reliability. Discrepancies between such cues and problems in combining them are suggested to underlie some pain conditions. Therefore, we examined whether visuomotor integration is altered in twenty-two participants with upper or lower limb complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) compared to twenty-four controls. Participants located targets that appeared in the unaffected (CRPS) / dominant (controls) or affected (CRPS) / non-dominant (controls) side of space, using the hand of their unaffected/dominant or affected/non-dominant side of the body. For each side of space and each hand, participants located the target using visual information and no movement (vision only condition), an unseen pointing movement (self-motion only condition), or a visually-guided pointing movement (visuomotor condition). In all four space-by-hand conditions, controls reduced their variability in the visuomotor compared to the vision and self-motion only conditions and in line with a model prediction for optimal integration. Participants with CRPS showed similar evidence of cue combination in two of the four conditions. However, they had better-than-optimal integration for the unaffected hand in the affected space. Furthermore, they did not integrate optimally for the hand of the affected side of the body in unaffected space, but instead relied on the visual information. Our results suggest that people with CRPS can optimally integrate visual and self-motion cues under some conditions, despite lower reliability of self-motion cues, and use different strategies to controls.
在自主运动过程中,我们会根据感觉和自身运动线索的可靠性,对其进行最佳组合,以优化运动表现。一些疼痛状况被认为是由于这些线索之间存在差异,以及它们的组合存在问题。因此,我们检测了 22 名患有上肢或下肢复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)的参与者与 24 名对照者的视动整合是否存在差异。参与者使用未受影响(CRPS)/优势(对照)或受影响(CRPS)/非优势(对照)侧的手,定位出现在空间的不受影响(CRPS)/优势(对照)或受影响(CRPS)/非优势(对照)侧的目标。对于每个空间侧和每只手,参与者使用视觉信息(仅视觉条件)、看不见的指向运动(仅自身运动条件)或视觉引导的指向运动(视动条件)来定位目标。在所有四个空间与手的条件下,与仅视觉和仅自身运动条件相比,对照者在视动条件下降低了他们的变异性,这与最佳整合的模型预测一致。在四个条件中的两个条件中,CRPS 参与者显示出类似的线索组合证据。然而,他们在受影响的空间中,对未受影响的手的整合表现出了优于最佳的状态。此外,他们在未受影响的空间中,对手的受影响侧的身体的整合并非最佳,而是依赖于视觉信息。我们的结果表明,尽管自身运动线索的可靠性较低,但 CRPS 患者在某些情况下可以对视觉和自身运动线索进行最佳整合,并使用与对照者不同的策略。