The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-yat, Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1440-1446. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01144-8. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Background The recommended dose of rasburicase is quite expensive, thus limiting its use. Whether a lower dose of rasburicase would be equally effective for critically ill children, who often have more complicated situations and a higher risk of hospital death, is still unknown. Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of low-dose rasburicase in critically ill children with haematological malignancies who are at high risk of tumour lysis syndrome. Setting A single-centre retrospective cohort study. Method Children with haematological malignancies who had a history of rasburicase exposure during an intensive care unit stay were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the initial dosage of rasburicase: the standard-dose group (> 0.1 mg/kg/day) and the low-dose group (≤ 0.1 mg/kg/day). The adverse events and short-term prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results Thirty-seven children were selected, 22 in the standard-dose group and 15 in the low-dose group. The most common tumour type was Burkitt's lymphoma (81%), followed by acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (11%). All patients were at high risk of tumour lysis syndrome, and 73% of them had 3 or more tumour lysis syndrome risk factors. The uric acid levels of 90% of patients with hyperuricaemia returned to the normal range within 12 h (100% in the standard-dose group and 75% in the low-dose group, P = 0.083). Eighty-four percent of patients presented serious complications, including tumour lysis syndrome (73%), acute kidney injury (59%), renal replacement treatment (24%), respiratory failure (24%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (16%) and heart failure (11%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious complications between the two groups. The overall 7-day and 28-day survival rates after intensive care unit admission were 86% and 84%, respectively. The average length of stay in the intensive care unit was 9.92 ± 5.13 days. Neither the short-term mortality nor the length of stay in the intensive care unit were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Low-dose rasburicase is effective and may be an acceptable choice for critically ill children with haematological malignancies.
背景 拉布立酶的推荐剂量较为昂贵,因此限制了其应用。对于经常存在更复杂情况和更高院内死亡风险的危重症血液病患儿,较低剂量的拉布立酶是否同样有效尚不清楚。目的 探讨小剂量拉布立酶治疗高危肿瘤细胞溶解综合征血液病危重症患儿的安全性和疗效。 环境 单中心回顾性队列研究。 方法 纳入入住重症监护病房期间使用过拉布立酶的血液病患儿。根据拉布立酶初始剂量将患儿分为两组:标准剂量组(>0.1mg/kg/天)和小剂量组(≤0.1mg/kg/天)。比较两组患儿的不良事件和短期预后。 结果 共纳入 37 例患儿,其中标准剂量组 22 例,小剂量组 15 例。最常见的肿瘤类型为伯基特淋巴瘤(81%),其次为急性淋巴细胞白血病(11%)。所有患儿均存在肿瘤细胞溶解综合征高危因素,其中 73%的患儿存在 3 项或以上肿瘤细胞溶解综合征高危因素。90%的高尿酸血症患儿的尿酸水平在 12h 内恢复正常(标准剂量组 100%,小剂量组 75%,P=0.083)。84%的患儿出现严重并发症,包括肿瘤细胞溶解综合征(73%)、急性肾损伤(59%)、肾脏替代治疗(24%)、呼吸衰竭(24%)、弥散性血管内凝血(16%)和心力衰竭(11%)。两组严重并发症发生率无显著差异。重症监护病房入院后 7 天和 28 天的总生存率分别为 86%和 84%。重症监护病房的平均住院时间为 9.92±5.13 天。两组患儿的短期死亡率和重症监护病房住院时间均无显著差异。 结论 小剂量拉布立酶对血液病危重症患儿有效,可能是一种可接受的选择。