Bansal Neetu, Dogra Mehak, Mehta Parul, Khan Shabab Ahmed, Jhunjhunwala Nitin, Gupta Pulkit
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Private Practitioner, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2958-2962. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1132_19. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Evidence-based practice is the cornerstone of dentistry and especially endodontics. Diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment with recent advancement based on evidence would be a great help for the patent satisfaction and treatment prognosis; hence, the aim of present study was to explore difference between perception, knowledge, and practice of endodontists and general dental practitioners (GDPs) towards evidence-based practice and factors associated with it.
The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire study conducted among specialists in the subject of conservative and endodontic dentistry and GDPs working in private clinics in Modinagar city, Uttar Pradesh. The study was conducted in October 2019. In the present study, a close-ended questionnaire was prepared to determine the perception and practice of dental specialists.
The majority of endodontists (31 [35.22%]) belonged to the age group of 36-45 years of age while most of the GDPs (32 [36.36%]) belonged to 25-35 years of age group. The majority of endodontists were females (56[63.64%]) and most of the GDPs were males (50 (56.81]). More endodontists (47 [53.42]) had a positive perception of evidence-based practice than GDPs (15[16.42]). Practice toward evidence was fair among most of the endodontists (49 [55.68%]) and GDPs (54 [61.36%]).
There was a more positive perception regarding evidence-based practice among endodontists than GDPs, knowledge was high among endodontists regarding evidence-based practice and practice was also good among endodontists. Factors associated with perception, knowledge, and practice among endodontists and GDPs were age in years, gender, year of practice, number of endodontic patients treating per month.
循证医学实践是牙科尤其是牙髓病学的基石。基于证据的诊断、治疗计划以及随着近期进展的治疗,将对患者满意度和治疗预后有很大帮助;因此,本研究的目的是探讨牙髓病医生和普通牙科医生(GDPs)在循证医学实践方面的认知、知识和实践差异以及与之相关的因素。
本研究是一项横断面描述性问卷调查研究,对象为保守和牙髓病学领域的专家以及在北方邦莫迪纳加尔市私人诊所工作的普通牙科医生。研究于2019年10月进行。在本研究中,准备了一份封闭式问卷以确定牙科专家的认知和实践情况。
大多数牙髓病医生(31名[35.22%])年龄在36 - 45岁之间,而大多数普通牙科医生(32名[36.36%])年龄在25 - 35岁之间。大多数牙髓病医生为女性(56名[63.64%]),而大多数普通牙科医生为男性(50名[56.81%])。与普通牙科医生(15名[16.42%])相比,更多的牙髓病医生(47名[53.42%])对循证医学实践有积极认知。大多数牙髓病医生(49名[55.68%])和普通牙科医生(54名[61.36%])在循证实践方面表现一般。
与普通牙科医生相比,牙髓病医生对循证医学实践的认知更为积极,牙髓病医生在循证医学实践方面知识水平较高,实践情况也较好。与牙髓病医生和普通牙科医生的认知、知识和实践相关的因素有年龄、性别、从业年限、每月治疗的牙髓病患者数量。