Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Int J Urol. 2021 Jan;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/iju.14381. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol in the management of high attenuation value upper ureteric stones compared with slow-rate, power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy.
This was a randomized trial enrolling patients with a single high attenuation value (≥1000 HU) upper ureteric stones between January 2019 and July 2019. Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy (54 patients) was applied at a rate of 30 shock waves/min with power ramping from 6 to 18 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min, followed by ramping 18-22 kV for 100 shock waves, then a safety pause for 2 min. Then, full power (22 kV) was maintained until the end of the session. Slow-rate, power-ramping shock wave lithotripsy (47 patients) was applied at a rate of 60 shock waves/min with power ramping from 6 to 10 kV during the first 500 shock waves, then from 11 to 22 kV during the next 1000 shock waves, then maintained on 22 kV in the last 1500 shock waves. Up to three sessions were carried out with a follow up 3 months after the last session. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate. Perioperative data of the two protocols were compared.
There was no significant difference in preoperative data. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy after single (92.6% vs 23.4%) and multiple (96.3% vs 63.8%) sessions. Most complications were mild, with no significant difference between both groups (9.3% vs 12.8%; P = 0.573). Logistic regression analysis identified ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy protocol as the only significant independent factor for the stone-free rate (odds ratio 12.589, P = 0.025).
Ultraslow full-power shock wave lithotripsy for high attenuation value upper ureteric stones is associated with a significantly higher stone-free rate, and with mild complications that are comparable to those of standard shock wave lithotripsy.
评估超慢全功率冲击波碎石方案在治疗高衰减值上段输尿管结石方面的疗效和安全性,与慢速率、功率递增式冲击波碎石方案进行比较。
这是一项 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月间进行的随机试验,纳入了单一高衰减值(≥1000 HU)上段输尿管结石患者。超慢全功率冲击波碎石(54 例)以 30 次/分的速率进行,功率从 6 千伏升至 18 千伏,共 100 次,然后安全暂停 2 分钟,接着功率从 18 千伏升至 22 千伏,共 100 次,然后再安全暂停 2 分钟。然后,以 22 千伏的全功率维持至治疗结束。慢速率、功率递增式冲击波碎石(47 例)以 60 次/分的速率进行,前 500 次的功率从 6 千伏升至 10 千伏,接下来的 1000 次从 11 千伏升至 22 千伏,最后 1500 次以 22 千伏维持。每个方案最多进行 3 次治疗,末次治疗后 3 个月进行随访。主要结局是结石清除率。比较两种方案的围手术期数据。
两组患者术前数据无显著差异。单次(92.6% vs 23.4%)和多次(96.3% vs 63.8%)治疗后,超慢全功率冲击波碎石的结石清除率显著更高。大多数并发症为轻度,两组间无显著差异(9.3% vs 12.8%;P=0.573)。Logistic 回归分析确定超慢全功率冲击波碎石方案是结石清除率的唯一显著独立因素(比值比 12.589,P=0.025)。
对于高衰减值上段输尿管结石,超慢全功率冲击波碎石术具有更高的结石清除率,且并发症轻微,与标准冲击波碎石术相当。