• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术在瑞典的成功引入。

Successful Introduction of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Discectomy in Sweden.

作者信息

Beck Joel, Westin Olof, Klingenstierna Mikael, Baranto Adad

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):563-570. doi: 10.14444/7075. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.14444/7075
PMID:32986579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7477988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) procedures has made it possible to challenge microscopic discectomy as the gold standard method to treat lumbar disc herniations.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to investigate the introductory-phase postoperative clinical improvement for FELD patients regarding leg pain, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), complications, reoperations, and learning curve analysis.

METHODS

All patients who underwent FELD at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, were prospectively included during 2013- 2017. A total of 92 patients were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. The characteristics of the study population, degree of leg pain, complications, learning curve, and PROMs were retrieved from patient records and the National Quality Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine).

RESULTS

The postoperative results demonstrated major improvements; leg pain measured by a numerical rating scale (0-10) decreased from 7.4 ± 2.25 to 2.76 ± 2.70, with a mean improvement of -4.54, (-3.62-5.46) 95% confidence interval (CI). The Oswestry Disability Index decreased by 30.48 (-36.27-23.73) with a 95% CI, and the EuroQol-5D increased by 0.39 (0.21-0.57) 95% CI. An assessment of the final surgical result showed that 91.6% ranked their general situation as better or much better. Specifically, regarding postoperative leg pain, 87% regarded their leg pain as completely gone, much better, or somewhat better, while 13% regarded their leg pain as unchanged or worse. A learning curve analysis showed that for every 10th FELD procedure performed; the duration of surgery decreased by 2 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the introduction of FELD as a safe, quick procedure for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations can yield significant gains in patient-reported outcome measurements and pain reduction. The rate of recurrence and complications is comparable to that of standard surgery.

摘要

背景

全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(FELD)的引入使得挑战将显微椎间盘切除术作为治疗腰椎间盘突出症的金标准方法成为可能。

目的

本研究的目的是调查FELD患者术后初期在腿痛、患者报告结局测量(PROMs)、并发症、再次手术以及学习曲线分析方面的临床改善情况。

方法

2013年至2017年期间,前瞻性纳入了瑞典萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院所有接受FELD手术的患者。共纳入92例患者并随访1年。从患者记录和国家脊柱手术质量登记处(Swespine)获取研究人群的特征、腿痛程度、并发症、学习曲线和PROMs。

结果

术后结果显示有显著改善;用数字评分量表(0 - 10)测量的腿痛从7.4±2.25降至2.76±2.70,平均改善-4.54,95%置信区间(CI)为(-3.62 - 5.46)。Oswestry功能障碍指数降低了30.48(95%CI为-36.27 - 23.73),欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol - 5D)提高了0.39(95%CI为0.21 - 0.57)。对最终手术结果的评估显示,91.6%的患者将其总体状况评为较好或好得多。具体而言,关于术后腿痛,87%的患者认为他们的腿痛完全消失、好得多或有所好转,而13%的患者认为他们的腿痛没有变化或更糟。学习曲线分析表明,每进行第10例FELD手术,手术时间减少2分钟。

结论

在我们的研究中,引入FELD作为一种安全、快速治疗腰椎间盘突出症的方法,在患者报告结局测量和疼痛减轻方面可取得显著成效。复发率和并发症发生率与标准手术相当。

相似文献

1
Successful Introduction of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Discectomy in Sweden.全内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术在瑞典的成功引入。
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):563-570. doi: 10.14444/7075. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vs Standard Discectomy: A Noninferiority Study on Clinically Relevant Changes.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与标准椎间盘切除术:关于临床相关变化的非劣效性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):364-369. doi: 10.14444/8458. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症:一项采用患者报告结局指标的回顾性研究
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 20;5(4):272-277. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0159. eCollection 2021.
4
Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy: Retrospective Review of Clinical Results and Complications in 545 International Patients.全内镜下椎板间腰椎间盘切除术:545 例国际患者的临床结果和并发症回顾性分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:e922-e928. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.101. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Association of extended duration of sciatic leg pain with worse outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: a register study in 6216 patients.坐骨神经痛持续时间延长与腰椎间盘突出症手术后较差预后的关联:一项对6216例患者的登记研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 12;34(5):759-767. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20602. Print 2021 May 1.
7
Longitudinal clinical outcomes after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation after open discectomy.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗开放手术后复发性椎间盘突出症的纵向临床结果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb;72:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.047. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Redefining Surgical Boundaries for Obese Patients? Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Proves Equally Effective With Shorter Hospital Stay in Obese Patients.重新定义肥胖患者的手术界限?全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术对肥胖患者同样有效,且住院时间更短。
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):2-10. doi: 10.14444/8654.
9
The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.年轻、活跃人群腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的结果:按突出类型和节段的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42.
10
[Full-endoscopic interlaminar approach discectomy for central lumbar disc extrusion].[全内镜下经椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术治疗中央型腰椎间盘突出症]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jun 16;95(23):1807-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiographic Anatomy and Clinical Value of the Modified Corner Approach in Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.改良角入路在椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术中的影像学解剖及临床价值
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2640-2646. doi: 10.1111/os.70143. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Evaluating the Use of PROMs in Paediatric Orthopaedic Registries.评估患者报告结局量表在儿科骨科登记处的应用。
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;10(9):1552. doi: 10.3390/children10091552.
3
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vs Standard Discectomy: A Noninferiority Study on Clinically Relevant Changes.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与标准椎间盘切除术:关于临床相关变化的非劣效性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):364-369. doi: 10.14444/8458. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Reducing the learning curve of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy: mushroom model-simulation training.缩短椎板间全内镜下椎间盘切除术的学习曲线:蘑菇模型模拟训练
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2805-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07680-x. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?腰椎间盘突出症手术后的成功结果能用奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数原始评分来定义吗?
Global Spine J. 2020 Feb;10(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/2192568219851480. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register.随访失访对瑞典脊柱登记处结局解读的影响较小。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06181-0. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis.不同椎间盘切除术技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的并发症发生率:网络荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Nov;28(11):2588-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06142-7. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation Improves the Learning Curve.基于 O-Arm 导航的经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术可改善学习曲线。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 10;2019:6509409. doi: 10.1155/2019/6509409. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of 7 Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis.比较 7 种腰椎间盘突出症手术干预方法:一项网络荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):E863-E871.
6
Initial Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using an Interlaminar Approach at the L4-L5.L4-L5节段经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术的初步临床疗效
Pain Physician. 2017 May;20(4):E507-E512.
7
Complications of Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Full-endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy: A Large, Single-Center, Retrospective Study.全内镜下腰椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的并发症:一项大型单中心回顾性研究
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E379-E387.
8
Full-endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic and open discectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.全内镜与微内镜及开放椎间盘切除术:结局与并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
9
Minimal Incision, Multifidus-sparing Microendoscopic Diskectomy Versus Conventional Microdiskectomy for Highly Migrated Intracanal Lumbar Disk Herniations.微创、保留多裂肌的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗高度移位型腰椎管内椎间盘突出症的比较
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):805-813. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00588.
10
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:Meta 分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061. Epub 2016 May 31.