School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):221-240. doi: 10.1177/1747021820959633. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
This study aims to improve understanding of how distracting information and target task demands influence the strength of gaze and non-biological (arrow and moving line) cuing effects. Using known non-predictive central cues, we manipulated the degree of distraction from additional information presented on the other side of the target, and target task difficulty. In Experiment 1, we used the traditional unilateral cuing task, where participants state the location of an asterisk and the non-target location is empty (no distraction). Experiment 2 comprised a harder localisation task (which side contains an embedded oddball item) and presented distracting target-related information on the other side. In Experiment 3, we used a discrimination task (upright or inverted embedded T) with distracter information that was unrelated or related to the target (low vs. high distraction, respectively). We found that the magnitude of cuing scaled with the degree of combined distraction and task demands, increasing up to six-fold from Experiments 1 and 2 to the high-distraction condition in Experiment 3. Thus, depleting attentional resources in this manner appears to weaken the ability to ignore uninformative directional cues. Findings are discussed within the framework of a resource-limited account of cue inhibition.
本研究旨在深入了解分心信息和目标任务需求如何影响注视和非生物(箭头和移动线)提示效应的强度。我们使用已知的非预测性中央提示,操纵目标另一侧呈现的额外信息的分心程度和目标任务难度。在实验 1 中,我们使用传统的单侧提示任务,参与者需要指出星号的位置,而非目标位置为空(无分心)。实验 2 包含更难的定位任务(哪一侧包含嵌入式异常项),并在另一侧呈现干扰性的目标相关信息。在实验 3 中,我们使用了一个辨别任务(嵌入式 T 的直立或倒置),其中分心信息与目标无关或相关(分别为低分心和高分心)。我们发现,提示的大小与组合分心和任务需求的程度成正比,从实验 1 和 2 到实验 3 的高分心条件,提示的大小增加了六倍。因此,以这种方式耗尽注意力资源似乎会削弱忽略非信息性方向提示的能力。研究结果在资源有限的提示抑制理论框架内进行了讨论。